WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

441
http://web.archive.org/web/20210626005543/https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/crime/article/Teen-sex-trafficking-victims-from-Houston-land-16274177.php

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Like holy fuck moshe. You are saying that sexual predation of children on kikebook is not only "speech" but protected speech. Holy fuck.

[–] -2 pt

You blind triple faggot how do you think this is going to go? You think government regulators will stop at what YOU think is sexual predation of children? You think they'll stop at what THEY think is sexual predation of children? You think they'll stop at actual predation of anyone? You think they'll stop at all? All they need is a precedent. A foot in the door. A patriot act or a commerce clause. And after abuse after abuse of our rights justified by this and every other fig leaf and excuse under the sun you actually truly believe that THIS time when they're saying "think of the children" it's actually about the children. There's no way you were dropped on your head as a baby. Idiocy of this magnitude takes YEARS of hard work.

[–] 3 pts

(((porn))) isn't even protected speech and here you are claiming that child-predation is.

but muh (((porn))) is legal because jewtus said so!!!

"Obscene" - no it's not.

[–] -1 pt

"child predation" is an undefined scare word that will be redefined every time it's convenient. And not that I brought it up but porn is speech regardless of its legal status, and should not be regulated. The US first amendment doesn't create rights, it recognizes them and holds back the government. I don't even know why you use the word "obscene" but that too is an undefined scare word.