GOD BLESS TEXAS
GOD BLESS TEXAS
http://web.archive.org/web/20210626005543/https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/crime/article/Teen-sex-trafficking-victims-from-Houston-land-16274177.php
Yeah! Regulate free speech! For the children!
Yeah! Regulate free speech! For the children!
Just a reminder:
All images, videos or depictions of any kind that show sexually explicit or suggestive content involving children (whether virtual or real) is strictly prohibited. Additionally, any other depiction or form of media that shows sexually explicit content which is illegal in the United States (such as bestiality) is prohibited.
Additionally, content or communications seeking to solicit, lure or entice minors into sexual activity or lewd behavior is also strictly prohibited. Any image depicting minors in a sexual way at all is prohibited.
We have a zero tolerance regarding pedophilia
Just a reminder:
> All images, videos or depictions of any kind that show sexually explicit or suggestive content involving children (whether virtual or real) is strictly prohibited. Additionally, any other depiction or form of media that shows sexually explicit content which is illegal in the United States (such as bestiality) is prohibited.
> Additionally, content or communications seeking to solicit, lure or entice minors into sexual activity or lewd behavior is also strictly prohibited. Any image depicting minors in a sexual way at all is prohibited.
> https://poal.co/tos
We have a zero tolerance regarding pedophilia
Make your statement in clear English you weasel. Outright accuse me of being a pedo and be mocked or withdraw your implication.
Make your statement in clear English you weasel. Outright accuse me of being a pedo and be mocked or withdraw your implication.
You're a pedo pushing child predation as not only speech but protected speech. There's no confusion here. We all know what (((you're))) doing.
You're a pedo pushing child predation as not only speech but protected speech. There's no confusion here. We all know what (((you're))) doing.
lol
lol
This has nothing to do with free speech you insidious kike.
This has nothing to do with free speech you insidious kike.
Like holy fuck moshe. You are saying that sexual predation of children on kikebook is not only "speech" but protected speech. Holy fuck.
Like holy fuck moshe. You are saying that sexual predation of children on kikebook is not only "speech" but protected speech.
Holy fuck.
You blind triple faggot how do you think this is going to go? You think government regulators will stop at what YOU think is sexual predation of children? You think they'll stop at what THEY think is sexual predation of children? You think they'll stop at actual predation of anyone? You think they'll stop at all? All they need is a precedent. A foot in the door. A patriot act or a commerce clause. And after abuse after abuse of our rights justified by this and every other fig leaf and excuse under the sun you actually truly believe that THIS time when they're saying "think of the children" it's actually about the children. There's no way you were dropped on your head as a baby. Idiocy of this magnitude takes YEARS of hard work.
You blind triple faggot how do you think this is going to go? You think government regulators will stop at what YOU think is sexual predation of children? You think they'll stop at what THEY think is sexual predation of children? You think they'll stop at actual predation of anyone? You think they'll stop at all? All they need is a precedent. A foot in the door. A patriot act or a commerce clause. And after abuse after abuse of our rights justified by this and every other fig leaf and excuse under the sun you actually truly believe that THIS time when they're saying "think of the children" it's actually about the children. There's no way you were dropped on your head as a baby. Idiocy of this magnitude takes YEARS of hard work.
(((porn))) isn't even protected speech and here you are claiming that child-predation is.
but muh (((porn))) is legal because jewtus said so!!!
"Obscene" - no it's not.
(((porn))) isn't even protected speech and here you are claiming that child-predation is.
>but muh (((porn))) is legal because jewtus said so!!!
"Obscene" - no it's not.
Pick a thing you can't have best of both worlds. Either you censor and control your site, or embrace free speech. Not hey I don't like unwoke people but child predators are dande.
Pick a thing you can't have best of both worlds. Either you censor and control your site, or embrace free speech. Not hey I don't like unwoke people but child predators are dande.
No one is doing that. They're just stifling speech.
No one is doing that. They're just stifling speech.
Conspiracy to commit crime isn't free speech.
Conspiracy to commit crime isn't free speech.
I guess Mark Zuckerberg is going to have to find another way to get dates.
I guess Mark Zuckerberg is going to have to find another way to get dates.
Problem: this is meaningless. Kikebook will get fined a paltry amount that it will use (((tax law))) to offput onto taxpayers. Happens ALL THE TIME. This is not good at all. The ruling may be correct, but it's a carrot on a stick.
Problem: this is meaningless. Kikebook will get fined a paltry amount that it will use (((tax law))) to offput onto taxpayers. Happens ALL THE TIME.
This is not good at all. The ruling may be correct, but it's a carrot on a stick.
I'm going to be hated and take the opposite position.
If I run a site I don't want to be compliant with the civil practices for all 500+ justifications my site might be used from, plus criminal code.
The internet should be lawless. And if it isn't good for most people to be on a lawless system, then maybe most people don't need to be on the internet. The internet becoming a public space accessed by the majority was the worst thing to happen to the internet.
Of course I understand that the particular subject matter here is sensitive but the general principle here is flawed. I think most of us can admit it when we understand just how retarded the laws of many places can be, and how insane it would be to ask small sites to be compliant with them and how anti-freedom it would become given some of the less sensical laws. What can be applied to a large site can be applied to a small site. There has to be some other way this sensitive subject can be addressed besides requiring web sites to track the civil president of every state, and every province, of every country.
I'm going to be hated and take the opposite position.
If I run a site I don't want to be compliant with the civil practices for all 500+ justifications my site might be used from, plus criminal code.
The internet should be lawless. And if it isn't good for most people to be on a lawless system, then maybe most people don't need to be on the internet. The internet becoming a public space accessed by the majority was the worst thing to happen to the internet.
Of course I understand that the particular subject matter here is sensitive but the general principle here is flawed. I think most of us can admit it when we understand just how retarded the laws of many places can be, and how insane it would be to ask small sites to be compliant with them and how anti-freedom it would become given some of the less sensical laws. What can be applied to a large site can be applied to a small site. There has to be some other way this sensitive subject can be addressed besides requiring web sites to track the civil president of every state, and every province, of every country.
Nothing will happen.
Nothing will happen.
Don't let your kids use Facebook
Don't let your kids use Facebook
Sue the absolute shit out of suckabucks!!! That mrfker needs to burn in hell
Sue the absolute shit out of suckabucks!!! That mrfker needs to burn in hell
Based on the author https://s.hdnux.com/photos/60/24/53/12667604/4/premium_author_bio.jpg
I'm willing to wage money that this article is intentionally "poorly written" so as to leave out important elements of the case and show kikebook as sympathetic.
I expect if you dove into the evidence presented you'd find that kikebook had been repeatedly warned that this girls were being forced into prostitution and they refused to intervene.
Based on the author
https://s.hdnux.com/photos/60/24/53/12667604/4/premium_author_bio.jpg
I'm willing to wage money that this article is intentionally "poorly written" so as to leave out important elements of the case and show kikebook as sympathetic.
I expect if you dove into the evidence presented you'd find that kikebook had been repeatedly warned that this girls were being forced into prostitution and they refused to intervene.
(post is archived)