From the article it says he compromised and in fact did not call a man a man. He used only the surname.
That is compelling of speech you disagree with. I repeat, he did not misgender. Only refused to gender. Wow this is unbelievable.
From the article it says he compromised and in fact did not call a man a man. He used only the surname.
That is compelling of speech you disagree with. I repeat, he did not misgender. Only refused to gender. Wow this is unbelievable.
(post is archived)