Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] • 12 pts

It is protected and will be overturned. What we need is for judges to be sanctioned when their decisions are overturned. People suffer real consequences when these bad decisions are made. Judges should suffer real consequences when they are overturned.

[–] [deleted] • 11 pts

Judges never, ever suffer any consequences for their bad decisions. They know it so they have no reason at all to make good decisions.

[–] [deleted] • 5 pts

It is protected and will be overturned

most likely

Judges should suffer real consequences when they are overturned.

Something different needs to happen. What we've got now certainly isn't working - activist judges finding permanent spots on the bench and handing out decisions that go against the betterment of their community and society.

[–] • 1 pt

It was already overturned. Sad that it even had to be on something obvious.

[–] • 0 pt

Sanctioned? If it's a constitutional issue they should be convicted of deprivation of rights under color of law and thrown in prison under that felony statute.

[–] • 0 pt

Judges should be penalized if they are overturned. Every overturned decision should come with a semester of schooling and a suspension of pay.

[–] • 0 pt

Three overturns and they're out, though.

Penalties should be percentage-based pay cuts and indefinate cancelation of all future raises.

[–] [deleted] • 7 pts

No women or jews in public office.

[–] • 5 pts

It's not even free speech. They just ruled for COMPELLED SPEECH. He did not misgender IT. He merely refused to use any gendered terms.

Fucking synagogue of Satan. Some one should do something about that.

[–] • 3 pts (edited )

Actually refused the other person's misgendering and spoke the truth.

I will no longer use he she xir etc. I will use

Person with a penis or Person with a clitoris.

[–] • 2 pts

From the article it says he compromised and in fact did not call a man a man. He used only the surname.

That is compelling of speech you disagree with. I repeat, he did not misgender. Only refused to gender. Wow this is unbelievable.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

The way some are good with castrating themselves, you should amend it to “person born with a penis” or “person born with a clit”

[–] • 0 pt

Good point.

BWP (Born With Penis) or NBWP (Not Born With Penis)

[–] • 1 pt

So basically, not getting it right the first time is now a crime?

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

It’s your own fault for not realizing this beautiful person is a strong, independent woman.

https://i.imgflip.com/2q6wih.jpg

[–] • 1 pt

This transgender bullshit seems easily hackable. Just indicate that when you call them sir or madam thatbyou are not referring to their gender. Which you do not contest but rather their biological sex which is immutable.

[–] • 1 pt

This ruling ought to result in an immediate impeachment and criminal charges for failing to uphold her oath to the constitution.

[–] • 1 pt

So I can call you an asshole, a nigger, a cracker, a kike, a Trump lover, a journalist, or satanic pedophile, but I cannot call you by your biological sex.

Clown world.

[–] • 0 pt

those judges are enemies of the constitution

[–] • 0 pt

Thou shalt not bear false witness. Game over jackboots.

[–] • 0 pt

If the college is receiving federal funds, isn't this compelled speech a violation of the first amendment? If the college is purely private, then there's no expectation of protection.

[–] • 0 pt

Creating their own interpretation of the English language. give them no consideration. dudes have a dick, bitches have a pussy. You don't need to inform them of this. you just have to remember what goes where when making a human. it's futile to argue with fools, you can't fix broken humans.

Load more (1 reply)