Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

353

May. 24, 2021

Filmmaker Abby Martin secured a major victory for free speech on Monday after a federal court ruled that her First Amendment rights were violated when she was blocked from speaking at Georgia Southern University in 2016 for refusing to "sign a contractual pledge to not boycott Israel" in compliance with Georgia's anti-Boycott, Divest and Sanctions law.

"I am thrilled at the judge's decision finding this law unconstitutional as it so clearly violates the free speech rights of myself and so many others in Georgia," Abby Martin said in a statement on Twitter. "My First Amendment rights were restricted on behalf of a foreign government, which flies in the face of the principles of freedom and democracy."

Martin continued: "The government of Israel has pushed state legislatures to enact these laws only because they know that sympathy and support for the population they brutalize, occupy, ethnically cleanse and subject to apartheid, is finally growing in popular consciousness -- they want to hold back the tide of justice by preemptively restricting the right of American citizens to peacefully take a stand against their crimes."

https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=62256

Good win for free speech, and a loss for Israel, Zionists, and AIPAC the Israeli lobby.

May. 24, 2021 Filmmaker Abby Martin secured a major victory for free speech on Monday after a federal court ruled that her First Amendment rights were violated when she was blocked from speaking at Georgia Southern University in 2016 for refusing to "sign a contractual pledge to not boycott Israel" in compliance with Georgia's anti-Boycott, Divest and Sanctions law. "I am thrilled at the judge's decision finding this law unconstitutional as it so clearly violates the free speech rights of myself and so many others in Georgia," Abby Martin said in a statement on Twitter. "My First Amendment rights were restricted on behalf of a foreign government, which flies in the face of the principles of freedom and democracy." Martin continued: "The government of Israel has pushed state legislatures to enact these laws only because they know that sympathy and support for the population they brutalize, occupy, ethnically cleanse and subject to apartheid, is finally growing in popular consciousness -- they want to hold back the tide of justice by preemptively restricting the right of American citizens to peacefully take a stand against their crimes." https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=62256 Good win for free speech, and a loss for Israel, Zionists, and AIPAC the Israeli lobby.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (34).
[–] • 0 pt

Likely a controlled op. They are going to use liberal fronts to show conservatives to do the opposite of the libs.

[–] • 1 pt

Being against Israel should be something both conservatives and liberals can unite on....but the kike control is apparently too deep for that.

[–] • 0 pt

True, but the libs don't make the connection with jews and israel for some reason. They view the jews as victims, yet they view the palestinians as victims in this situation. They are viewing two nations, yet when they talk about jews, they are thinking about holohoax victims.

[–] • 0 pt

Nah it's probably just done to get it before SCOTUS so they can rule that criticizing Pissreal or kikes in any capacity is a federal crime punishable by death or something fucking gay like that.

[–] • 1 pt

Right, that's partially what I mean.

They know what they are doing, and they are able to play the left/right paradigm like a fiddle.

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah sorry I wasn't disagreeing, just adding on to your point.