It is because the OP pasted the link twice into the link field:
Instead of once:
___
The page was altered from it previously being an article titled:
"Police ID killer in FedEx shooting as 19-year-old man"
To now being:
"FBI says it interviewed FedEx mass shooter last year"
___
It also does say their name in both the old page version and the new page version:
"The shooter was identified as 19-year-old Brandon Scott Hole of Indiana, two law enforcement officials briefed on the matter told The Associated Press."
___
Also, here is a photo of Brandon Scott Hole and the other article the image is from:
- https://files.catbox.moe/6xgfvx.webp (webp opens in new tab not expando for some reason)
- https://files.catbox.moe/7egaum.jpg (same image converted to jpg to open in expando)
"PICTURED: FedEx gunman, 19, was an ex-employee who had ‘been fired’"
He looks so young to me. I sometimes wonder if 18 is the right age to be considered an adult.
14 used to be considered manhood. If we continue to coddle people, they will continue to be children.
16 should be especially in the case the sheboons and taxi driver. And the jew lawyer trying to get then to serve no jail time and not be tried as adults. This shit needs to change. Commit adults crimes go to adult jail.
i mean i guess if you want to apply a law without regard to the specific situation of the person who committed the crime, combined with their cognitive development or lack thereof. If someone was dealt a really bad hand in life and they didn't recognize or truly grasp consequences because they were too young, should we punish them as though they were adults with fully developed mentation? If yes, does that apply to toddlers who bite a sibling?
I was wondering if 18 was the right age to be considered an adult because just judging by the amount of physical development and facial structure of that guy, his skin texture and tone, he is obviously still in his teenage years. Which is significantly different compared to what you see in that adult age where a person's face doesn't change much between 25 and 40 (assuming you don't put on or take off weight). I don't think the mental development is finished by 18, in fact most neuroscientists today believe brain development continues through at least the mid 20's (25 is used as the consensus).
Now don't misunderstand my perceptions, although I am saying I don't believe he is fully developed to an adult brain or mental capacity, I am also not implying any position on if you should go to adult jail if you commit adult crimes. My honest position on it is similar to your belief, but not exactly the same.
I think there are certain crimes that are in a sense "non-negotiable" that the criminal responsible must go to something SIMILAR to "adult jail" although I don't think it needs to be full-on adult prison. It should be at least split like schools are, with a "children's jail" for middle school years and then another "children's jail" for high school years.
Unless you choose instead, that non-negotiable criminals have NO potential for rehabilitation--and if you so think--then why are we keeping them around at all?... just to feed them and house them for the rest of their lives? Is that the best we can do, just incarcerate and hold these criminals indefinitely? Its either do that, hold them indefinitely, or its rehabilitation or essentially the last option is to decree the death penalty for all those that commit a "non-negotiable crime". Unless you can think of another option I'm missing?
I'm interested in your answer!
(post is archived)