a law is necessary for something that is already protected
So you are already protected from liability for pedestrians who enter roadways outside of crosswalks.
That isn't followed. Who says this will? This is a virtue signal.
>a law is necessary for something that is already protected
So you are already protected from liability for pedestrians who enter roadways outside of crosswalks.
That isn't followed. Who says this will? This is a virtue signal.
(post is archived)