Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

475

Climate child Greta Thunberg is the subject of a new criminal investigation after she tweeted a list of her scripted marching orders, apparently accidentally, to her 4.8 million Twitter followers.

It appears as though the 18-year-old global warming activist was trying to tweet an “organic” post in support of the farmers protest in India when she mistakenly shared a document from her handlers outlining tactics for rallying left-wing Twitter users to join the movement.

“These are just some suggested posts, but feel free to tweet your own,” read the first bullet point on the document, which Greta quickly deleted once she realized, apparently, what she had done.

“It’s helpful if you add images or videos to your tweets (some images below),” the document went on to explain. “You can also tag others who can either reshare and/or the potential tags listed above to put pressure on them as well.”

Below these instructions was a series of sample tweets with a “CLICK HERE TO TWEET” button for each one. All Greta had to do, it appears, was click on one and pretend it was her own, and voila: instant support from her drone followers.

“The list gave a series of tips on what to post, asking her to also repost and tag other celebrities tweeting about it, including pop star Rihanna,” reported the New York Post.

“As well as the Twitter storm, the ‘toolkit’ she shared also suggested highlighting planned demonstrations at Indian embassies.”

Climate child Greta Thunberg is the subject of a new criminal investigation after she tweeted a list of her scripted marching orders, apparently accidentally, to her 4.8 million Twitter followers. It appears as though the 18-year-old global warming activist was trying to tweet an “organic” post in support of the farmers protest in India when she mistakenly shared a document from her handlers outlining tactics for rallying left-wing Twitter users to join the movement. “These are just some suggested posts, but feel free to tweet your own,” read the first bullet point on the document, which Greta quickly deleted once she realized, apparently, what she had done. “It’s helpful if you add images or videos to your tweets (some images below),” the document went on to explain. “You can also tag others who can either reshare and/or the potential tags listed above to put pressure on them as well.” Below these instructions was a series of sample tweets with a “CLICK HERE TO TWEET” button for each one. All Greta had to do, it appears, was click on one and pretend it was her own, and voila: instant support from her drone followers. “The list gave a series of tips on what to post, asking her to also repost and tag other celebrities tweeting about it, including pop star Rihanna,” reported the New York Post. “As well as the Twitter storm, the ‘toolkit’ she shared also suggested highlighting planned demonstrations at Indian embassies.”

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (116).
[–] • 1 pt

Flat-Earth is the least-likely cosmogony; spaceballs is the likeliest, but the Concave Earth actually has a lot going for it. The only “weirdness” required is “bendy light”, and it works wonders for gravity, being a kind of outward pressure pushing out - that is, down in a concave earth.

I’m a Young-Earth TradOx, and I still acknowledge spaceballs to be the likeliest. I do believe we’re massively lied to about the nature of the Heavens - enough to justify the assertion that space is fake and gay - and I also believe “extraterrestrials” are demonic in origin.

Antarctica is indeed a massive conspiracy. I suspect it has something to do with the “fossil fuel” industry.

@baphometworshipper

[–] • 0 pt

suspect it has something to do with the “fossil fuel” industry.

you mean like, the growing GMO canola to turn into "crude oil" ? Don't need Antarctica for that. Probably more something to do with vast amounts of land/minerals there as Admiral Byrd said larger than the USA. Or the contients that lay beyond it; such as the ones depicted in that old Japanese map.

[–] • 1 pt

you mean like, the growing GMO canoloa to turn into "oil" ?

No, I don’t mean that at all. I’ve never heard that canola oil theory - I just don’t think canola agricultural could possibly keep up with oil consumption. Can’t say for absolute certain, but it sounds pretty far-fetched.

Probably more something to do with vast amounts of land/minerals there as Admiral Byrd said larger than the USA.

This is more like what I’m talking about.

Or the contients that lay beyond it; such as the ones depicted in that old Japanese map.

I’ve seen references to all this; seems like a really difficult thing to keep covered up for so long. Again, not impossible, just seems like a big stretch.

@CHIRO

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

This is more like what I’m talking about.

Same. I think there could be things with 'greater impact' there as well. I'm just not comfortable to speculate. It's all fun to think about.

I've thought for a very long time that current theories on biogenic oil need revision. There are probably certain deposits that would absolutely throw the current theories for a loop.

But the Nazis were also into some weird stuff, and the fascination with that landmass could go beyond natural resources. Hopefully we find out someday!

[–] • 0 pt

I am not familiar with concave earth. I'm assuming the idea is we're like a bowl, where all of the landmass sits on the inner surface of the bowl?

I cannot get behind the young earth position, but again not much hangs on it either way from my perspective. Existence itself is miraculous enough, that whether earth came into being !snap! just like that, or congealed from the dust and gas left over from a supernova across billions of years, is not much of a consequence to my belief system. I find the latter likelier, but again, for me scientific explanation has a certain domain of reality it is epistemically closed in explaining. If the outcome is X, I need not have a firm position on whether X came to be instantaneously, or whether it was first Y and gradually became X. Both are instances of existence which in any case are non-random, which is logically enough to get me where I need to be. The Logos of the universe is on display in either case.

[–] • 0 pt

Concave Earth is that we’re inside a concavity, and the Heavens are all surrounded by the earth. So the whole sky fits within a spheroid ~8000 miles in diameter, and what’s “outside” underground is a mystery.

[–] • 0 pt

I think simulation-theory is a better way of conceiving of The Creation. The Universe took six days to boot up.