WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

583

Climate child Greta Thunberg is the subject of a new criminal investigation after she tweeted a list of her scripted marching orders, apparently accidentally, to her 4.8 million Twitter followers.

It appears as though the 18-year-old global warming activist was trying to tweet an “organic” post in support of the farmers protest in India when she mistakenly shared a document from her handlers outlining tactics for rallying left-wing Twitter users to join the movement.

“These are just some suggested posts, but feel free to tweet your own,” read the first bullet point on the document, which Greta quickly deleted once she realized, apparently, what she had done.

“It’s helpful if you add images or videos to your tweets (some images below),” the document went on to explain. “You can also tag others who can either reshare and/or the potential tags listed above to put pressure on them as well.”

Below these instructions was a series of sample tweets with a “CLICK HERE TO TWEET” button for each one. All Greta had to do, it appears, was click on one and pretend it was her own, and voila: instant support from her drone followers.

“The list gave a series of tips on what to post, asking her to also repost and tag other celebrities tweeting about it, including pop star Rihanna,” reported the New York Post.

“As well as the Twitter storm, the ‘toolkit’ she shared also suggested highlighting planned demonstrations at Indian embassies.”

Climate child Greta Thunberg is the subject of a new criminal investigation after she tweeted a list of her scripted marching orders, apparently accidentally, to her 4.8 million Twitter followers. It appears as though the 18-year-old global warming activist was trying to tweet an “organic” post in support of the farmers protest in India when she mistakenly shared a document from her handlers outlining tactics for rallying left-wing Twitter users to join the movement. “These are just some suggested posts, but feel free to tweet your own,” read the first bullet point on the document, which Greta quickly deleted once she realized, apparently, what she had done. “It’s helpful if you add images or videos to your tweets (some images below),” the document went on to explain. “You can also tag others who can either reshare and/or the potential tags listed above to put pressure on them as well.” Below these instructions was a series of sample tweets with a “CLICK HERE TO TWEET” button for each one. All Greta had to do, it appears, was click on one and pretend it was her own, and voila: instant support from her drone followers. “The list gave a series of tips on what to post, asking her to also repost and tag other celebrities tweeting about it, including pop star Rihanna,” reported the New York Post. “As well as the Twitter storm, the ‘toolkit’ she shared also suggested highlighting planned demonstrations at Indian embassies.”

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

what part of don't believe that which you cannot prove or cannot see or cannot measure, repeat and observe in reality do you not understand? We could be discussing productive topics like what postive action can we set in motion to prevent rabbis from chopping up and sucking on baby dicks in our local communities or how to help our grandparents escape the lockdown quarantine isolation prisons for which they now find themselves. But no, always back to some archaic religious minueity; as is intended by your friendly forever conflict perpetuators - while we argue they live (and plot the next grand fraud).

[–] 0 pt

what part of don't believe that which you cannot prove or cannot see or cannot measure, repeat and observe in reality do you not understand?

You just got done talking about “GMO canola oil” replacing fossil fuels and continents outside Antarctica, and then say this to me? Pot, that kettle is black.

But no, always back to some archaic religious minueity; as is intended by your friendly forever conflict perpetuators - while we argue they live (and plot the next grand fraud).

You’ve clearly got some axe to grind against Christianity. Sorry man, people just aren’t going to believe what you say about things. You’ll just have to deal with that.

If you want people to take you seriously about it, maybe offer some substance. Understand opposing arguments, and make substantial counter-claims. Your opinion about “archaic religious minueity” isn’t terribly substantial.

@CHIRO

[–] 0 pt (edited )

No axe, it's just that you've clearly got some Christianity sales pitch agenda to all of your posts which is what started this meaningless debate. I wish to offer nothing, I do not wish to be taken seriously. This is a fucking honeypot with AI driven (((members))) posting senselss dribble 90% of the time (well, maybe 60% - seems actually a decent amount of organic action and AOU is doin' a bangup job)

You just got done talking about “GMO canola oil” replacing fossil fuels and continents outside Antarctica, and then say this to me? Pot, that kettle is black.

touche' friend ! (still better than invisible skygod though :p )

[–] 0 pt

Good reply. I’ve got pictures of God all over my house. In that He became incarnate, it became possible for many eyewitnesses to see Him.

Now obviously I can’t make anyone else believe that, but because I sincerely believe it is true, I object on logical grounds to the “invisible skygod” comment. If what I am saying is true, then what you are saying is not.

Anyhow, good chat. I think you’re not an idiot!