what part of don't believe that which you cannot prove or cannot see or cannot measure, repeat and observe in reality do you not understand?
You just got done talking about “GMO canola oil” replacing fossil fuels and continents outside Antarctica, and then say this to me? Pot, that kettle is black.
But no, always back to some archaic religious minueity; as is intended by your friendly forever conflict perpetuators - while we argue they live (and plot the next grand fraud).
You’ve clearly got some axe to grind against Christianity. Sorry man, people just aren’t going to believe what you say about things. You’ll just have to deal with that.
If you want people to take you seriously about it, maybe offer some substance. Understand opposing arguments, and make substantial counter-claims. Your opinion about “archaic religious minueity” isn’t terribly substantial.
No axe, it's just that you've clearly got some Christianity sales pitch agenda to all of your posts which is what started this meaningless debate. I wish to offer nothing, I do not wish to be taken seriously. This is a fucking honeypot with AI driven (((members))) posting senselss dribble 90% of the time (well, maybe 60% - seems actually a decent amount of organic action and AOU is doin' a bangup job)
You just got done talking about “GMO canola oil” replacing fossil fuels and continents outside Antarctica, and then say this to me? Pot, that kettle is black.
touche' friend ! (still better than invisible skygod though :p )
Good reply. I’ve got pictures of God all over my house. In that He became incarnate, it became possible for many eyewitnesses to see Him.
Now obviously I can’t make anyone else believe that, but because I sincerely believe it is true, I object on logical grounds to the “invisible skygod” comment. If what I am saying is true, then what you are saying is not.
Anyhow, good chat. I think you’re not an idiot!
Nice. I've got pictures of Baphomet all over my house too!!
(post is archived)