Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

796

Climate child Greta Thunberg is the subject of a new criminal investigation after she tweeted a list of her scripted marching orders, apparently accidentally, to her 4.8 million Twitter followers.

It appears as though the 18-year-old global warming activist was trying to tweet an “organic” post in support of the farmers protest in India when she mistakenly shared a document from her handlers outlining tactics for rallying left-wing Twitter users to join the movement.

“These are just some suggested posts, but feel free to tweet your own,” read the first bullet point on the document, which Greta quickly deleted once she realized, apparently, what she had done.

“It’s helpful if you add images or videos to your tweets (some images below),” the document went on to explain. “You can also tag others who can either reshare and/or the potential tags listed above to put pressure on them as well.”

Below these instructions was a series of sample tweets with a “CLICK HERE TO TWEET” button for each one. All Greta had to do, it appears, was click on one and pretend it was her own, and voila: instant support from her drone followers.

“The list gave a series of tips on what to post, asking her to also repost and tag other celebrities tweeting about it, including pop star Rihanna,” reported the New York Post.

“As well as the Twitter storm, the ‘toolkit’ she shared also suggested highlighting planned demonstrations at Indian embassies.”

Climate child Greta Thunberg is the subject of a new criminal investigation after she tweeted a list of her scripted marching orders, apparently accidentally, to her 4.8 million Twitter followers. It appears as though the 18-year-old global warming activist was trying to tweet an “organic” post in support of the farmers protest in India when she mistakenly shared a document from her handlers outlining tactics for rallying left-wing Twitter users to join the movement. “These are just some suggested posts, but feel free to tweet your own,” read the first bullet point on the document, which Greta quickly deleted once she realized, apparently, what she had done. “It’s helpful if you add images or videos to your tweets (some images below),” the document went on to explain. “You can also tag others who can either reshare and/or the potential tags listed above to put pressure on them as well.” Below these instructions was a series of sample tweets with a “CLICK HERE TO TWEET” button for each one. All Greta had to do, it appears, was click on one and pretend it was her own, and voila: instant support from her drone followers. “The list gave a series of tips on what to post, asking her to also repost and tag other celebrities tweeting about it, including pop star Rihanna,” reported the New York Post. “As well as the Twitter storm, the ‘toolkit’ she shared also suggested highlighting planned demonstrations at Indian embassies.”

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (116).
[–] • 1 pt

Why would the Jews choose a guy defying the state's prescribed doubleplusgood Newspeak (flagrantly and successfully, remember) as a method of catapulting a dude into the public consciousness so he can...say the exact same shit he's been saying for decades, like, "Everybody should read The Gulag Archipelago"?

Do you think it's possible for a voice to gain popularity organically? What does that look like and what characteristics can we use to recognize such phenomena?

[–] • 3 pts (edited )

I acknowledged it was possible in the comment you replied to.

But don't forget Jews play both sides of the aisle with the ultimate goal being to move groups as a whole to the containment of the pasture.

As long as you are pointing out Jordan's defiance of the newspeak, we can also note his refusal to deal with the topic of the Jew (including that embarrassing moment on stage when he was confronted about 200 Years Together and could not even muster an answer to the question), his total admonishment of group identity where it concerns whites, and his not subtle encouragement of every man to enter the current establishment and rise through its hierarchy. At no point does he acknowledge what it means when that hierarchy is turned upside down or when it tracks values anathema to the host society, all the while speaking about the horrors of white group identity while shirking the Jewish identity.

Again, if you believe that Jordan has done something personally beneficial for you, great. I'm not claiming his writings won't do that, but I also specified that I was looking at the bigger picture.

To answer your final question, there is nobody who reaches that level in popular culture today without endorsement. People that are truly outsiders and represent a threat to the existing order are crushed. We've just witnessed high-level politicians, including members of congress, get existing publishing contracts cancelled. Jordan never had a publishing contract cancelled. He was at one point in talks to host a recurring segment on Dr. Oz. Not only wasn't he cancelled, he was very quickly slated for appearances on a publicity circuit around the world. News stations across the developed world picked him up, and threw softballs at him like Cathy Newman. It wasn't simply a matter of him gaining organic popularity by bootstrapping, the establishment picked him up and put him everywhere. Now consider some of the other voices historically who were truly exposing the establishment narrative: crushed. The second Fischer came out and began speaking about the Jews, they made him a pariah. David Irving also comes to mind.

I also think about an author like E. Michael Jones. The man has written highly anticipated books through his own independent publishing company because he had to. He was fired from a professorship at Notre Dame (did Jordan ever lose his job with UofT?), and was blacklisted from publishing. Amazon removed his most controversial titles. Despite his fandom, Jones has been relegated to taking interviews with obscure personalities on Youtube, getting perhaps his biggest audience through Owen fucking Benjamin. Meanwhile, Rogan is parading Jordan around with, what, 4 episodes in two years?

[–] • 0 pt

Not only do jews play all sides, they don't co-ordinate as a single unitary block.

Partially it is part of the jewish religious and cultural teachings (they actually believe they can outsmart their god by interpreting their bible in autistic ways) but also it is just part and parcel of their genetic predisposition to high levels of autism. They don't see the world the way normal people do. They see the world the way an autistic mathematician does, as a set of cold hard mechanical processes that can be exploited to their own benefit.

This is why every conversation with a jew, as described by Hitler in his book is pointless. You are having a meaningful conversation with them while they view the conversation as a set of abstract procedures that can be arranged / re-arranged to their benefit.

This is why people on our side keep on talking about the jewish conspiracy. While there are all sorts of jewish groups getting together and organizing, there is no overall global single conspiracy. What our people can sense is that there is something wrong with these people, and what is wrong is that they are always looking to exploit every loophole and every kind word of our people.

They are a kind of parasite species.

[–] • 1 pt

Thanks for the comments. I agree with your perspective on the Jews. That said, it does make it difficult to discuss with regular people due to the added complexity. There is a contradiction that runs through the logic of most people. They want to indict you if you tell them there is a unitary Jewish enemy, but then if you try to explain the situation with some more sophistication, you lose them because there isn't a unitary enemy.