Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

1.1K

Climate child Greta Thunberg is the subject of a new criminal investigation after she tweeted a list of her scripted marching orders, apparently accidentally, to her 4.8 million Twitter followers.

It appears as though the 18-year-old global warming activist was trying to tweet an “organic” post in support of the farmers protest in India when she mistakenly shared a document from her handlers outlining tactics for rallying left-wing Twitter users to join the movement.

“These are just some suggested posts, but feel free to tweet your own,” read the first bullet point on the document, which Greta quickly deleted once she realized, apparently, what she had done.

“It’s helpful if you add images or videos to your tweets (some images below),” the document went on to explain. “You can also tag others who can either reshare and/or the potential tags listed above to put pressure on them as well.”

Below these instructions was a series of sample tweets with a “CLICK HERE TO TWEET” button for each one. All Greta had to do, it appears, was click on one and pretend it was her own, and voila: instant support from her drone followers.

“The list gave a series of tips on what to post, asking her to also repost and tag other celebrities tweeting about it, including pop star Rihanna,” reported the New York Post.

“As well as the Twitter storm, the ‘toolkit’ she shared also suggested highlighting planned demonstrations at Indian embassies.”

Climate child Greta Thunberg is the subject of a new criminal investigation after she tweeted a list of her scripted marching orders, apparently accidentally, to her 4.8 million Twitter followers. It appears as though the 18-year-old global warming activist was trying to tweet an “organic” post in support of the farmers protest in India when she mistakenly shared a document from her handlers outlining tactics for rallying left-wing Twitter users to join the movement. “These are just some suggested posts, but feel free to tweet your own,” read the first bullet point on the document, which Greta quickly deleted once she realized, apparently, what she had done. “It’s helpful if you add images or videos to your tweets (some images below),” the document went on to explain. “You can also tag others who can either reshare and/or the potential tags listed above to put pressure on them as well.” Below these instructions was a series of sample tweets with a “CLICK HERE TO TWEET” button for each one. All Greta had to do, it appears, was click on one and pretend it was her own, and voila: instant support from her drone followers. “The list gave a series of tips on what to post, asking her to also repost and tag other celebrities tweeting about it, including pop star Rihanna,” reported the New York Post. “As well as the Twitter storm, the ‘toolkit’ she shared also suggested highlighting planned demonstrations at Indian embassies.”

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (116).
[–] • 0 pt (edited )

it's not frutiful to debate the topic, for me this is like Santa Clause Easter bunny stuff. But you are obviously an idol worshipper by your idolotry in the (((Bible))) and worship of (((God))) and his fabled son (((Jesus))) who you so quickly accept just as Mormon's accept their Freemason Bible author too.

There are a couple themes here that should be blatantly obvious but to sumrize it: you believe in fables which are conveniently all invisible and as such require you to suspend then giveway your authority in order for them to be valid. Cause if you were to reject and retain your authority to analyze, observe, prove the constant barrage of frauds the same hoaxters have been fleecing you with for centuries then you would not find the hard evidence - Santa, Jesus, and zero gravity/giant planets/snow on Mars/dinosaurs/viruses et all are frauds based on invisible things that only work because you BELIEVE. NASA earning $50 million a day taxpayer budget is evidently not motive enough for you. Only the selfish, lazy, and incompetent or all of the above enable NASA to extract that much and there's a whole fleet of military Judeao Masonic industrialists who are lining up to get ever more of these fat contracts apart of this gift that keeps on giving; an even wilder success than religions thanks primarily to a rebranding of it into "science".

With that out of the way, get a Nikon P900 and zoom into the stars and 'planets' for yourself. They are not the masonic CG images fed to us by the priests of NASA/JAXA/ESA/ISA et all. They are literally glowy orb energy things (I dunno man, they're not solid). The sun, the moon and all of these bodies seem to be translucent light phenomena not unlike a rainbow. But don't take my word for it, I am just trying to share the extent of paradigm shift needed to comprehend this; but its not hard after you see amateur video of stars - and while you're at it look at helium balloon camera launches of our beautiful flat plane as they make their ascent up there.

Finally, it seems we do agree on the basis of the topic - ie its not particularly relevant to our current situation; more prudent to focus on issues local in your area; there are more pressing matters but obviously knowing more again as you suggest like wtf is going on in Anarctica would be nice.

[–] • 0 pt

Traditional Christianity took over the entire ancient world, because the common man of the age recognized the completion of their ancient Faith that they inherited from their peasant ancestry. We remain a powerful intellectual force right up to the modern day - somewhat less so than before, but still present - because the worldview is logically complete and consistent.

You’ve got this view that kindergarten-level Sunday School “Jesus-loves-me-this-I-know—cuz-the-Bible-tells-me-so” of what constitutes Christianity. I wouldn’t be surprised if it never occurred to you there was anything more to it.

You probably figured all these heavy-hitting ancient, medieval and early-modern philosophers and scientists over the last couple thousand years just wanted to believe in Easter Bunnies or some shit. The logical inconsistency of that thought hasn’t really dawned on you, yet.

[–] • 0 pt

what part of don't believe that which you cannot prove or cannot see or cannot measure, repeat and observe in reality do you not understand? We could be discussing productive topics like what postive action can we set in motion to prevent rabbis from chopping up and sucking on baby dicks in our local communities or how to help our grandparents escape the lockdown quarantine isolation prisons for which they now find themselves. But no, always back to some archaic religious minueity; as is intended by your friendly forever conflict perpetuators - while we argue they live (and plot the next grand fraud).

[–] • 0 pt

what part of don't believe that which you cannot prove or cannot see or cannot measure, repeat and observe in reality do you not understand?

You just got done talking about “GMO canola oil” replacing fossil fuels and continents outside Antarctica, and then say this to me? Pot, that kettle is black.

But no, always back to some archaic religious minueity; as is intended by your friendly forever conflict perpetuators - while we argue they live (and plot the next grand fraud).

You’ve clearly got some axe to grind against Christianity. Sorry man, people just aren’t going to believe what you say about things. You’ll just have to deal with that.

If you want people to take you seriously about it, maybe offer some substance. Understand opposing arguments, and make substantial counter-claims. Your opinion about “archaic religious minueity” isn’t terribly substantial.

@CHIRO

[–] • 0 pt

I just want to point out ((())) hates Christ. They won't even speak His name most of the time. I watched a debate between a Catholic and a very prominent Jewish rabbi/philosopher recently, and the rabbi would not even refer to Christ by name, despite the fact they talked about the situation for around an hour. He would only say, "That situation 2,000 years ago."

In my humble opinion, it's time for you to reconsider your ideas about God, Christianity, and the Gospels.

@PS @KingOfWhiteAmerica

[–] • 0 pt

No, I don't need fiction or heresay tales from the past cluttering my mind.

And I am not so humble as you, forgive me, but it is absolutely time for you to reconsider your ideas about (((God, Christianity, the Gospels and anyfuckingthing you cannot prove, measure/repeat/isolate/examine in reality))).

[–] • 0 pt

You've said some things to me today, and to King, that I doubt you could prove. Maybe I'm wrong, but that's my instinct.