It says she’s a “no-planer”
She is not a no-planer, she said it that maybe no plane hit the Pentagon, which is an honest discussion. The Pentagon was designed as a "honeypot" to foster just that kind of disagreement. Since we have no real video and the bit we have shows a sharp nose cone like a missile, I can believe either scenario. The lack of wreckage is suspect, and there are reports of a bomb going off at about the same time as the hit. More important is that Cheney in the command bunker was told three times something was coming at the Pentagon from radar, and three times he refused to give the order to shoot it down. Cheney >> https://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/alibis/cheney.html
There was wreckage all over the Pentagon grounds though. Although they had just finished renovations at that very spot at the Pentagon two weeks prior, and a day prior there was major news of the Pentagon not accounting for trillions of dollars.
See .
Oh yeah Cheney totally knew about it. I’m tending toward missile in the Pentagon case, but I’m not going to die on that hill. The details of the Pentagon are the foggiest in my case - deception is the foundation of war, so we’ll never know exactly what happened since everything they do is utterly buried in lies.
Ugh... well that's retarded.
Oh man you think those were real planes? I had somebody tell me it was pretty advanced CGI for 2001.
There were too many videos from multiple angles, from too many people that did not have access to that kind of technology at the time, of which perfectly corroborated it. A 'higher end' computer at the time was 300mhz single core, and 3D accelerated video cards had only just come out. GPUs were not even available for the consumer market.
They were planes. The only one that you could say wasn't was the Pentagon, and even then there is a lot of evidence to suggest that it was.
(post is archived)