Kyle did nothing wrong.
Kyle did nothing wrong.
A Federal Civil case against Kyle Rittenhouse, facebook, the Kenosha Guard, the Boogaloo Bois, and others was dropped earlier this week. This case was silly, but is now over.
A Federal Civil case against Kyle Rittenhouse, facebook, the Kenosha Guard, the Boogaloo Bois, and others was dropped earlier this week. This case was silly, but is now over.
Kyle defended himself from 3 degenerate kikes and killed 2 in self defense. the third one was lucky his aim was off, otherwise the round would have got him in the head. to bad it didn't. it would have been 3 less kike assholes on the planet to share oxygen with.
Kyle defended himself from 3 degenerate kikes and killed 2 in self defense. the third one was lucky his aim was off, otherwise the round would have got him in the head. to bad it didn't. it would have been 3 less kike assholes on the planet to share oxygen with.
Joseph Rosenbaum was a convicted SERIAL child rapist, raping boys as young as 9 years old. Rest in Piss, the fucking kike filth got what he deserved.
Joseph Rosenbaum was a convicted SERIAL child rapist, raping boys as young as 9 years old. Rest in Piss, the fucking kike filth got what he deserved.
he still got off light as far as i am concerned. the judge in that case should have been disbared .rosenbaum should have been castrated.
he still got off light as far as i am concerned. the judge in that case should have been disbared .rosenbaum should have been castrated.
Chemically
Chemically
The nuts would you remove are in his rabbis mouth therefore you must kick him in the jaw.
The nuts would you remove are in his rabbis mouth therefore you must kick him in the jaw.
Pink arm mist for the win.
Pink arm mist for the win.
lmao
lmao
BEST NEWS OF THE DAY!!! Go Kyle, go Kyle, we are behind you!!!
BEST NEWS OF THE DAY!!! Go Kyle, go Kyle, we are behind you!!!
What does this mean for the criminal case?
What does this mean for the criminal case?
It means they're still gonna railroad him for daring to protect himself against convicted kike felons.
It means they're still gonna railroad him for daring to protect himself against convicted kike felons.
Nothing, completely separate.
Nothing, completely separate.
Right. OJ Simpson was found innocent in criminal and liable in civil, which led him to commit more crimes and actually get found guilty
Right. OJ Simpson was found innocent in criminal and liable in civil, which led him to commit more crimes and actually get found guilty
Nothing.
The criminal case has nothing to do with reality or the actual law. Sadly you can be convicted of a crime that you are objectively innocent of since it all comes down to the opinion of the judge and/or jury.
Nothing.
The criminal case has nothing to do with reality or the actual law. Sadly you can be convicted of a crime that you are objectively innocent of since it all comes down to the opinion of the judge and/or jury.
This is why people like us need to make sure we show up for jury duty.
JURY NULLIFICATION!!
This is why people like us need to make sure we show up for jury duty.
JURY NULLIFICATION!!
im pretty sure they try and filter out anybody that knows about jury nullification, because cleaning the kangaroos out of the courts is antisemetic.
im pretty sure they try and filter out anybody that knows about jury nullification, because cleaning the kangaroos out of the courts is antisemetic.
Yeah, they interview all jury candidates screening out everyone with an IQ above 90. Even if you larp during the interview and manage to get a seat on the jury they’ll charge you with contempt of court if you don’t do what they want.
The judicial system is totally fucked.
Yeah, they interview all jury candidates screening out everyone with an IQ above 90. Even if you larp during the interview and manage to get a seat on the jury they’ll charge you with contempt of court if you don’t do what they want.
The judicial system is totally fucked.
Technically correct, but grossly misleading title and description.
This has nothing to do with the criminal charges against him. These are completely different and irrelevant charges, based on an obscure law from civil war times, that most people weren't even aware of. The criminal charges are still on.
You took the time to write a description, but failed to include this critical piece of information, to farm upvotes and attention. Clickbait, in a nutshell.
Technically correct, but grossly misleading title and description.
This has nothing to do with the criminal charges against him. These are completely different and irrelevant charges, based on an obscure law from civil war times, that most people weren't even aware of. The criminal charges are still on.
You took the time to write a description, but failed to include this critical piece of information, to farm upvotes and attention. Clickbait, in a nutshell.
That's why the title says "CIVIL" case. Not misleading unless you're a moron. Everyone knows ( I thought) that civil and criminal cases are two different things. And civil cases are very common, not obscure at all.
That's why the title says "CIVIL" case. Not misleading unless you're a moron. Everyone knows ( I thought) that civil and criminal cases are two different things. And civil cases are very common, not obscure at all.
That's why I said it's technically correct. It is misleading because you fail to mention anything about which civil case you're talking about, or the nature of its charges. Leaving those details conspicuously missing implies that this is a case that everyone should know about, and that therefore needs no introduction. Which, in turn, can, and did, cause people to assume it is the case everyone knows about, or that it at least has an effect on it.
But this is not the case. Nor does it have any effect on it. Nor did anyone even know about this case. Nor is the fact it's been dropped relevant or newsworthy in any way. It's just noise.
And you know this perfectly well. That's why you left it so vague. Making you a lying, ratty little scumbag.
Also, I did not say civil cases are obscure. I said this one is based on an obscure law. Because it is.
That's why I said it's technically correct. It is misleading because you fail to mention anything about **which** civil case you're talking about, or the nature of its charges. Leaving those details conspicuously missing implies that this is a case that everyone should know about, and that therefore needs no introduction. Which, in turn, can, and did, cause people to assume it is **the** case everyone knows about, or that it at least has an effect on it.
But this is not **the** case. Nor does it have any effect on it. Nor did anyone even know about this case. Nor is the fact it's been dropped relevant or newsworthy in any way. It's just noise.
And you know this perfectly well. That's why you left it so vague. Making you a lying, ratty little scumbag.
Also, I did not say civil cases are obscure. I said this one is based on an obscure law. Because it is.
Lying, ratty little scumbag? I'm not responsible for how someone reads a headline - I posted the video I found interesting with the headline that was on it. Fuck off and die.
Lying, ratty little scumbag? I'm not responsible for how someone reads a headline - I posted the video I found interesting with the headline that was on it. Fuck off and die.
Dude deserves an honorary AR14.
Dude deserves an honorary AR14.
AR14 Do you mean AR-15, or is there an actual gun called an AR14?
> AR14
Do you mean AR-15, or is there an actual gun called an AR14?
A while back , Sleepy Joe was visiting a plant somewhere, maybe a car manufacturer. Don't remember but one of the employees got in Joe's face arguing about something and Joe mentioned AR14s. A weapons manufacturer then gave that worker an honorary "AR14" as a thank you for telling Joe to stick it up his ass. (fictional weapon except in Biden's mind)
A while back , Sleepy Joe was visiting a plant somewhere, maybe a car manufacturer. Don't remember but one of the employees got in Joe's face arguing about something and Joe mentioned AR14s. A weapons manufacturer then gave that worker an honorary "AR14" as a thank you for telling Joe to stick it up his ass. (fictional weapon except in Biden's mind)
This looks good for the (((Criminal charges))) this wouldn't happen if the (((criminal charges))) were strong or had merit.
Kek not even that. It's just a ridiculous kike lawsuit on behalf of fragile niggers.
~~This looks good for the (((Criminal charges))) this wouldn't happen if the (((criminal charges))) were strong or had merit~~.
Kek not even that. It's just a ridiculous kike lawsuit on behalf of fragile niggers.
Dumb ass nigger imagine white people have magic money just laying around. So they can somehow sue us for this money.
Ironically the same white people (Millennials and younger) now learning to hate them all over again do not have access to large amounts of money. Those were the boomers and in ten years when they're now too old to be around fucking stuff up and still pushing diversity bullshit things will finally change.
Dumb ass nigger imagine white people have magic money just laying around. So they can somehow sue us for this money.
Ironically the same white people (Millennials and younger) now learning to hate them all over again do not have access to large amounts of money. Those were the boomers and in ten years when they're now too old to be around fucking stuff up and still pushing diversity bullshit things will finally change.
Will he recover his 2 millions ? How does that work ?
Will he recover his 2 millions ? How does that work ?
The bail money? That's returned as long he goes to his court date for the criminal charges, which is different from this case.
The bail money? That's returned as long he goes to his court date for the criminal charges, which is different from this case.
I wish I could buy dat nigga a beer
I wish I could buy dat nigga a beer
Gud boi Kyle dindu nuffin. Gas the (((communists)))
Gud boi Kyle dindu nuffin. Gas the (((communists)))
(post is archived)