WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

655

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

Some good news for a change.

[–] 1 pt

More of this needs to happen. It shouldn't be glorified as it currently is.

[–] 1 pt

Children under the age of seven were conclusively presumed incapable of committing a crime because they did not possess the reasoning ability to understand that their conduct violated the standards of acceptable community behavior. Those between the ages of seven and fourteen were presumed incapable of committing a crime, but this presumption could be overcome by evidence, such as the child having possession of the gun immediately after the shooting. The rebuttable presumption for this age group was based on the assumption that, as the child grew older, he or she learned to differentiate between right and wrong. A child over the age of fourteen was considered to be fully responsible for his or her actions

https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Age+of+Reason

[–] 1 pt

Under 8 years old is the magic age at which pedophiles target children for that very same reason.

[–] 0 pt

seems to happen at all ages https://nypost.com/2021/01/28/school-security-guard-busted-for-alleged-sexual-abuse/

But the rules are different for "witnesses" where the kid only has to promise to not lie.

[–] 1 pt

A 13-14 year old isn't capable of differentiating between right and wrong? Bullshit, unless you're talking about niggers maybe.

I very explicitly remember knowing in Kindergarten that it was wrong to steal shit, cheat on schoolwork etc.

They used to have 13-14 year olds serving in the Navy on warships. If a modern 13-14 year old is incapable of this kind of thing, then something is very fucked.