WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

926

........ but we must protect the elderly.

........ but we must protect the elderly.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

So they can explain context around deaths when it suits them.

Just not for covid.

0.4% of all adverse reactions were death: https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html

Given how common adverse reactions are this is pretty outrageous.

[–] 2 pts

You realize this means that the death rate from the vaccine is literally double than the death rate from covid-19 itself.

[–] 1 pt

And you have to pay jews all along the way....

[–] 1 pt

Sort of like they are going for more than the .2% fatality rate of just letting nature take its course with no vaccine and inevitable herd immunity...nope, this is a jew business scheme.

[–] 1 pt

therefore it is expected that deaths close to the time vaccination may occur. In Norway, an average of 400 people die each week in nursing homes and long-term care facilities.

As of yesterday, Norway reports approx 42k first doses have been administered.

A quick look at anaphylaxis rates for a couple of other vaccines from 2019 was about 1 in a million. 1.3x10-6 vs. 5.5x10-4 for the new CoVid (((vaccines))) should probably be cause for alarm in any medical group that actually gives a shit.

[–] 0 pt

I read the expected rate is 1:1million and the rate for these vaccines has been more like 5:1million.

5x is better than 550x for having an increased rate of adverse reaction, for sure.