Why? To give them traffic? Epoch Times articles have this bullshit:
For the expando, huge gaps where ads would be (I have them blocked) whereas archive makes their articles look cleaner. (files.catbox.moe)
Then on the live site, it asks you to sign-up to read their article. (files.catbox.moe)
Archives are better for sharing here, period. If you want to give them traffic all you have to do is visit the live link obtained from the archive page.
oann.com links I really don't have much of an issue with, but you should always archive stuff in general for future use.
Why? To give them traffic? Epoch Times articles have this bullshit:
[For the expando, huge gaps where ads would be (I have them blocked) whereas archive makes their articles look cleaner.](https://files.catbox.moe/2k4g16.png)
[Then on the live site, it asks you to sign-up to read their article.](https://files.catbox.moe/d63p55.png)
Archives are better for sharing here, period. If you want to give them traffic all you have to do is visit the live link obtained from the archive page.
oann.com links I really don't have much of an issue with, but you should always archive stuff in general for future use.
(post is archived)