Anarchy simply means no central/federal government running things. That is it. There is nothing that states that it has to lead to chaos. In Africa it would of course. I think some white countries could handle it. There can still be a community and rules and laws, just not from a government.
A post collapse society can still have authority figures acting as government, which would then mean it isn't anarchy.
I think you have proved you're one of the brainwashed and stupid ones. Read the last jewpedia entry you sent. "Although anarchy is often negatively used as a synonym of chaos or societal collapse, this is not the meaning that anarchists attribute to anarchy, a society without hierarchies.[1] Proudhon wrote that anarchy is "Not the Daughter But the Mother of Order".[7]"
Go back to reddit, no need for NPC's here.
Of course there's nothing in the "anarchist's user manual" that states that it has to lead to chaos.
It's just going to lead to chaos, because human nature, because a few reasonable people aside, it's going to be everybody for himself and might is right. That's why anarchy is yet another utopia. It eventually works for a dozen of hippie monks on a remote island and that's about it. At the scale of a nation it's suicide, more organized groups such as your typical fascists will takeover
You have just proved you know nothing about reality, human nature, how about that?
(post is archived)