I learned that you use logical fallacies like biased sample sizes as if they are somehow relevant, while we use FBI statistics, and a lifetime of experience.
I learned that you use logical fallacies like biased sample sizes as if they are somehow relevant, while we use FBI statistics, and a lifetime of experience.
You made a claim about reality, and that claim was easily debunked.
You made a claim about reality, and that claim was easily debunked.
No, you used two competing stories against eachother, took the contrary side, and claimed it as a win.
You have nothing.
No, you used two competing stories against eachother, took the contrary side, and claimed it as a win.
You have nothing.
Neither story should be considered competing or contrary. They wouldn't be to an intelligent person. I just noticed a lot of stupid posts and comments decided to have a laugh by posting a story that shouldn't offend anyone.
Neither story should be considered competing or contrary. They wouldn't be to an intelligent person. I just noticed a lot of stupid posts and comments decided to have a laugh by posting a story that shouldn't offend anyone.
(post is archived)