Sounds like an idea straight out of /pol
https://pic8.co/sh/NV1oWH.jpeg
This will kill the NBA lol
I don't know the details about the accusation or the trial/settlement that ensued, but wasn't he not convicted?
Isn't calling someone a rapist who wasn't convicted sort of a "believe all women" NPC trope?
I don't know the details about the accusation or the trial/settlement that ensued, but wasn't he not convicted?
Isn't calling someone a rapist who wasn't convicted sort of a "believe all women" NPC trope?
He was not convicted. After the alleged victim's name and information was leaked, she was afraid to testify, particularly after death threats and the defense attacked her viciously. There was a civil case in which he settled for like $2.5 million, although he did not admit guilt, but did say he understands that she didn't think she consented. It was an odd situation and I think because of his wealth he was able to get off without the truth fully coming out one way or another.
He was not convicted. After the alleged victim's name and information was leaked, she was afraid to testify, particularly after death threats and the defense attacked her viciously. There was a civil case in which he settled for like $2.5 million, although he did not admit guilt, but did say he understands that she didn't think she consented. It was an odd situation and I think because of his wealth he was able to get off without the truth fully coming out one way or another.
That's about what I expected. I mean maybe he did something wrong, maybe he didn't. But to refer to him as rapist based on that information is a little funny. Especially if you're calling other people NPCs in the same breath.
That's about what I expected. I mean maybe he did something wrong, maybe he didn't. But to refer to him as rapist based on that information is a little funny. Especially if you're calling other people NPCs in the same breath.
lol yeah exactly.
lol yeah exactly.
(post is archived)