So, if you've read something you haven't verified yourself published by someone you haven't met or vetted then it's true? We're looking for universal truth here, not looking to match your broken and subverted narratives.
You're supposed to "challenge against" all theories to make them stronger. If you're here to push your own narratives without first understanding where others are they're not going to understand you.
I think it's pretty clear you don't think much of Jewish people if you prefer a world where many of them were killed without even challenging the story. Your antisemitism is disturbing, actually.
so you just trust what you hear from unverified sources like that documentary?
It's not "who" I trust. That is idolatry.
I test against and reject all I can. Sources sound interesting, but what can one confirm without experimentation? The "unverified source" is a bunch of experiments. I would love it if you could help me shed some light on it.
I really don't know anything. I certainly don't trust the mainstream narrative.
how can you test what happened in Nazi Germany nearly a century ago?
(post is archived)