WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

830

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

True or not, it's nice that we can finally kind of admit this whole "95% of the mass and energy in the universe must be undetectable" thing is probably wrong.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Just how big and expensive will machines need to get to be able to detect smaller and smaller particles of minuscule gelatinous energy? I doubt we'll ever find it all.

[–] 1 pt

I know, but when you have to say "Ok, most of the mass and energy in the known universe is totally undetectable or the models don't work" then well, I think some of the assumptions the models are based on are probably incorrect. But people seem very reluctant to say this.