So if a woman's nipples and breasts are no longer a sexual object (according to them) does that mean that sexual assault laws won't be applied against men touching them without consent?? Or is this one of those leftists double standards that they are so fond of?
So if a woman's nipples and breasts are no longer a sexual object (according to them) does that mean that sexual assault laws won't be applied against men touching them without consent?? Or is this one of those leftists double standards that they are so fond of?
(post is archived)