WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

773

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

>It will remove socially accepted coercive power. which accounts for 99% of property right violations around the world. Therefore there is great reason that by eradicating your gene-set, such power would be removed.

Property right violation you say? There's no property right violation when you don't have property rights to begin with

You have property rights because there's a legal framework backing and enforcing them. It's like borders, it's an imaginary thing, without an army to defend them, it's just a fantaisy, it's not real

Are you a one man army?

>The government was instrumentaly essential at every point of their activities. You're speculating at best. At worse, you're enabling their means to evil, hence the call for genocide.

I'm a realist, those "you are guilty of helping .gov you scum!" victimization techniques will lead you nowhere with me

...

Golden rule, the one who has the gold makes the rules, that's power 101

And you and I don't have the gold, they do

>In an anarcho-capitalist envrionement there would be no national debt (no debt owned by an institution which can so reliably tax the shit out of their cattle without resistance to pay a rate of return) to fund the world wars, the UN wouldn't be able to preside over institutions that own and rule over most of humanity. There would be no population that would tolerate the laws that maintain fiat monopolies (even more essential to funding the world wars) or coercive cartels.

Again, might is right, even more in an anarcho capitalist context, see golden rule

We already lose badly in a fight with rules, and you think we would prevail in a no rules fight?

Enslaved we would be in about one generation, medieval style

No coercive cartel? That's like ignoring what? 2000? 3000? 5000 years of tyranny? Organized crime?

>The tolerance of coercion form national power is their primary conduit of power through which they operate, to say that they woudl fair just as well without it is hubris beyond your authority so I very much doubt you know anything about me, let alone what I mean.

>Your turn to explain how they would be able to achieve what they have without the state, go on.

They would skip the fraud and scam soft power phase, and go straight for the jugular, totalitarian style

Don't worry, there's no shortage of goons willing to help them for a quick buck

.Gov is a front for the biggest crime syndicates, it's the velvet glove for the iron fist

Remove the glove you still get the iron fist

They don't seek power, THEY HAVE POWER

[–] 0 pt (edited )

So you've left the debate about ideal behavior to ''that's how stuff is I'm so smart! and I have no interest in debating startegy.

Goodbye then. May a nigger give you a practical demonstration of that level of engagement.

google a positive account of property rights for why property rgihts exist instead of giving this religious tier bullshit view of yours.

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

Oh, I see you couldn't refrain from pushing that -1 button

Butthurt much?

>Goodbye then. May a nigger give you a practical demonstration of that level of engagement.

That's right, resort to name calling now in place of argument, and run away

Might is right and the one who has the gold makes the rules

You don't get that you get nothing, it's that simple