The Justice system is often worse than criminals by supporting anything cops do.
The Justice system is often worse than criminals by supporting anything cops do.
meanwhile 90% of the shoplifters are statistically female and the retarded, or more likely predatorial, cannibal "security" chases around men in stores, what could be their motive?!.
meanwhile 90% of the shoplifters are statistically female and the retarded, or more likely predatorial, cannibal "security" chases around men in stores, what could be their motive?!.
90% of shoplifters are statistically niggers, and teenagers, so if you see a nigger teenager they are probably shoplifting. And also fat nigger bitches and their little kids too.
90% of shoplifters are statistically niggers, and teenagers, so if you see a nigger teenager they are probably shoplifting. And also fat nigger bitches and their little kids too.
spot on...in cannibal demographic its 100%, that's their culture cannibalism!(..
spot on...in cannibal demographic its 100%, that's their culture cannibalism!(..
They would have been better off helping the guy and picking off the pigs.
They would have been better off helping the guy and picking off the pigs.
It's not illegal when .gov does it
:/
Destruction of private property in the US, the new normal
It's not illegal when .gov does it
:/
Destruction of private property in the US, the new normal
once you allow some statism, where do you stop? you don't
once you allow some statism, where do you stop? you don't
I get what you mean
And I also think that you need to update your optics
It's not .gov censoring you online, it's not .gov calling the shots
You could have zero gov right now, you would be screwed just as much if not even more
Why is that?
https://explicithistoire.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/bilderberg-reseau.jpg
.gov at this point is merely a front, IMO
Removing .gov from the equation isn't going to make power go away
As the saying goes, the more things change, the more they stay the same
How well would the interests pictured above do, in an anarcho capitalist environment? They would probably do very well
And in a communist environment? They would probably do just as well...
I get what you mean
And I also think that you need to update your optics
It's not .gov censoring you online, it's not .gov calling the shots
You could have zero gov right now, you would be screwed just as much if not even more
Why is that?
https://explicithistoire.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/bilderberg-reseau.jpg
.gov at this point is merely a front, IMO
Removing .gov from the equation isn't going to make power go away
As the saying goes, the more things change, the more they stay the same
How well would the interests pictured above do, in an anarcho capitalist environment? They would probably do very well
And in a communist environment? They would probably do just as well...
Removing .gov from the equation isn't going to make power go away
It will remove socially accepted coercive power. which accounts for 99% of property right violations around the world. Therefore there is great reason that by eradicating your gene-set, such power would be removed.
They would probably do very well
The government was instrumentaly essential at every point of their activities. You're speculating at best. At worse, you're enabling their means to evil, hence the call for genocide.
In an anarcho-capitalist envrionement there would be no national debt (no debt owned by an institution which can so reliably tax the shit out of their cattle without resistance to pay a rate of return) to fund the world wars, the UN wouldn't be able to preside over institutions that own and rule over most of humanity. There would be no population that would tolerate the laws that maintain fiat monopolies (even more essential to funding the world wars) or coercive cartels.
The tolerance of coercion form national power is their primary conduit of power through which they operate, to say that they woudl fair just as well without it is hubris beyond your authority so I very much doubt you know anything about me, let alone what I mean.
Your turn to explain how they would be able to achieve what they have without the state, go on.
> Removing .gov from the equation isn't going to make power go away
It will remove socially accepted coercive power. which accounts for 99% of property right violations around the world. Therefore there is great reason that by eradicating your gene-set, such power would be removed.
> They would probably do very well
The government was instrumentaly essential at every point of their activities. You're speculating at best. At worse, you're enabling their means to evil, hence the call for genocide.
In an anarcho-capitalist envrionement there would be no national debt (no debt owned by an institution which can so reliably tax the shit out of their cattle without resistance to pay a rate of return) to fund the world wars, the UN wouldn't be able to preside over institutions that own and rule over most of humanity. There would be no population that would tolerate the laws that maintain fiat monopolies (even more essential to funding the world wars) or coercive cartels.
The tolerance of coercion form national power is their primary conduit of power through which they operate, to say that they woudl fair just as well without it is hubris beyond your authority so I very much doubt you know anything about me, let alone what I mean.
Your turn to explain how they would be able to achieve what they have without the state, go on.
Calling this travesty a result of the justice system implies that justice is the goal. It's a legal/political system that doles out justice unjustly.
Calling this travesty a result of the justice system implies that justice is the goal. It's a legal/political system that doles out justice unjustly.
... but when police have to protect the public ...
That's bull shit... the police don't protect the public, they only protect property.
https://www.barneslawllp.com/blog/police-not-required-protect
>... but when police have to protect the public ...
That's bull shit... the police don't protect the public, they only protect property.
https://www.barneslawllp.com/blog/police-not-required-protect
They protect ZOG, that's their job.
They protect ZOG, that's their job.
Fucking pigs. They love to chase and they'll destroy your home over NOTHING of worth apparently.
When shit hits the fan someday, all these cops are going to have a big fat target on them. Also, people will have no problem blowing them away if they come for the guns.
You destroy my home and life, fuck you pigs. They'd better kill me if they do.
Fucking pigs. They love to chase and they'll destroy your home over NOTHING of worth apparently.
When shit hits the fan someday, all these cops are going to have a big fat target on them. Also, people will have no problem blowing them away if they come for the guns.
You destroy my home and life, fuck you pigs. They'd better kill me if they do.
Judging by the comments nobody actually read the article. Joe Shit the homeowner got comped by his homeowners insurance minus a 5k deductible, rebuilt the house BIGGER, his dildo son had NO renters insurance so Joe and son sue for all the articles that were destroyed NEVER MIND that there was an ARMED standoff with the suspect.
He got his money from the homeowners insurance.
Judging by the comments nobody actually read the article. Joe Shit the homeowner got comped by his homeowners insurance minus a 5k deductible, rebuilt the house BIGGER, his dildo son had NO renters insurance so Joe and son sue for all the articles that were destroyed NEVER MIND that there was an ARMED standoff with the suspect.
He got his money from the homeowners insurance.
Did the Branch Davidians have home owners insurance in Waco? If they did; I guess everything was ok...
Did the Branch Davidians have home owners insurance in Waco? If they did; I guess everything was ok...
(post is archived)