Yes. Warlording is the 'natural state' in Somalia. You can't pull that shit out of their DNA by transplanting them to Minneapolis.

From the political system to the judicial system down to the streets, there are "issues" all the way down, at every step of the ladder They are so entrenched, so intricated, all our "issues", that, IMO, the solution can't come form a couple of fixes and larger fixes here and there over the course of the decade, it's not going to work, too little too late, at best It's like an avalanche, you don't stop that sort of things, you can try to prevent it from happening, but once it's going down there is only one startegy; Don't stay in its way ... However, when I see the pig crisis I see hope https://www.zerohedge.com/health/global-authorities-brace-worldwide-protein-shortage-after-quarter-earths-pigs-wiped-out Yeah I know, hope isn't a plan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destructionism Destructionism as discussed by Ludwig Von Mises, a classical liberal economist, is policies that consume capital but do not accumulate it. It is the title of Part V of his seminal work Socialism. Since accumulation of capital is the basis for economic progress (as the capital stock of society increases, the productivity of labor rises, as well as wages and standards of living), Von Mises warned that pursuing socialist and etatist policies will eventually lead to the consumption and reliance on old capital, borrowed capital, or printed "capital" as these policies cannot create any new capital, instead only consuming the old. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/joker-and-ideology-destructionism Authored by Jeffrey Tucker via The American Institute for Economic Research To review: his life was not working; he found something that worked for him finally. Then he embraced it. What is that thing he embraced? It has a particular name in the history of ideas: Destructionism. It’s not just a penchant; it’s an ideology, an ideology that purports to give shape to history and meaning to life. That ideology says that the sole purpose of action in one’s life should be to tear down what others have created, including life itself. This ideology becomes necessary because doing good seems practically impossible, because one still needs to make some difference in the world to feel that your life has some direction, and because doing evil is easy. The ideology of destructionism enables a person to rationalize that evil is at least somehow preparing the ground for some better state of society in the future. What is that better state? It could be anything. Maybe it’s a world in which everyone owns everything equally. Maybe it is a world without happiness or a world with universal happiness. Maybe it is a world without faith. Maybe it is national production with no international trade. It’s a dictatorship – society conforming to One Will. It’s the absence of patriarchy, a world without fossil fuels, an economy without private property and technology, production without the division of labor. A society of perfect morality. The ascendance of one religion. Whatever it is, it is illiberal and therefore unworkable and unachievable, so the advocate must eventually find solace not in creating but in destroying the existing order. The first time I read of the concept was in Ludwig von Mises’s 1922 book Socialism. He brings it up toward the end after having proven that socialism itself is impossible. If there is nothing positive to do, no real plan to achieve anything socially beneficial; because the whole idea is cockamamie to begin with, the proponents must either abandon the theory or find satisfaction in the demolition of society as it currently exists. ... Destructionism, that's what most people are going to be left with ultimately, in a not so distant future, imo