Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

How did they all agree to go in that direction at some point? Or at least, gave the impression that everybody was pretty much on board with the program, what was the "sensible narrative" justifying all that post wwII shit? Dominating peons and other nefarious aims aside

Without a one world government, what you have is everybody competing for world dominance, since "forever", which usually ended up with a global conflict, so they wanted to avoid that, and they came up with a plan

At least on the surface, I think that's how the whole idea got sold to everybody from left to right, pacifists included... Like it's going to be different this time...

Of course many got on board because it was convenient and many just went along with the program thinking they couldn't do shit about it anyways. And those who opposed it, well they got fucked

...

Now what "we" can see today I think, is that only klaus schwab and the wef clique really want that one world gov, the US is obviously throwing the EU under the bus as a last ditch effort to preserve what's left of its former world dominance, with the help of EU's useful idiots of course, that goes without saying. And at the same time russia and china are also saying fuck it, they're back to their default position, no more one world government bandwagon, they aren't even trying to play pretend anymore

How did they all agree to go in that direction at some point? Or at least, gave the impression that everybody was pretty much on board with the program, what was the "sensible narrative" justifying all that post wwII shit? Dominating peons and other nefarious aims aside Without a one world government, what you have is everybody competing for world dominance, since "forever", which usually ended up with a global conflict, so they wanted to avoid that, and they came up with a plan At least on the surface, I think that's how the whole idea got sold to everybody from left to right, pacifists included... Like it's going to be different this time... Of course many got on board because it was convenient and many just went along with the program thinking they couldn't do shit about it anyways. And those who opposed it, well they got fucked ... Now what "we" can see today I think, is that only klaus schwab and the wef clique really want that one world gov, the US is obviously throwing the EU under the bus as a last ditch effort to preserve what's left of its former world dominance, with the help of EU's useful idiots of course, that goes without saying. And at the same time russia and china are also saying fuck it, they're back to their default position, no more one world government bandwagon, they aren't even trying to play pretend anymore

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

I think India, Venezuela, Brazil, Iran, and a few others are also off the one world government train.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts (edited )

Syria is one of them, and there's a couple of countries in Africa also not aligned with the NWO.

[–] • 0 pt

Yes, just commented about that, left out Brazil.

[–] • 1 pt

North Korea as well.

[–] • 2 pts

I argued with this asshat of a friend about this I never met on Xbox live. He was 100% for the NWO and thinks the EU and US should be world powers that start it.

I argued the problem with this is corruption will be inevitable and it will accelerate. It will be out of control because they are the ones in charge, acting above all. And just like we are seeing from some presidents we would see the same from others in a NWO.

[–] • 1 pt

Several books and articles and videos out about this, the breakup of globalization.

Dr. Steve Turley talks about it a lot (youtube), and Peter Zeihan has a good book about it, also Luke Gromen.

Sweden, that Orban guy, Italy, USA, Russia, and more, changing.

[–] • 1 pt

Good government, in so far as there is such a thing, is small government; big government is bad government. This is axiomatic. Individiuals have more control over how they are governed when their government is local. The more remote the decision makers, the less effective their decisions.

It follows from this that the very worst government possible is global government. In a global government, not only individuals, but individiual nations, will have almost no say in their own futures. Dictates will be imposed on them by threats and force.

The reason there are revolutions that cause nations to split up into smaller nations is that people want to govern themselves, not be governed by some remote clueless and uncaring global entity. Global government, if it ever comes about, will always be tyranny.