WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

She likely had no authority to require this. Is that trademarked?

[–] 2 pts

I have no idea what the queen can and can't require of her subjects. (Or her grandchildren.) Hell, I can't even believe there's still a monarchy in Britain.

[–] 0 pt

It's more an elaborate game of make believe at the expense of the UK tax payers. Idk that they have any real power.

[–] 1 pt

I did a quick search.

She can't order Meghan because the USA owns that nigger, but Elizabeth owns Harry's sorry ass. This is certainly a sore point for the nigger as her plan was to cash in on stupid people while lowering the Royal Welfare Bums to an even lower station.

[–] 0 pt

“The Queen and senior officials are believed to have agreed it is no longer tenable for the couple to keep the word ‘royal’ in their ‘branding,'” the Daily Mail reported. “The couple have accepted that, as part of their new working arrangements, they will not be able to use the Sussex Royal name as they had hoped.”

This latest move by Queen Elizabeth underscores that she will not tolerate Prince Harry and Meghan Markle cheapening the British monarchy in order to make a few bucks.