Any grid not actively expanding nuclear is a grid engineered to fail. Nuclear expansion forces lower prices.
Any grid actively expanding with wind or solar is a grid engineered to fail and forces prices higher.
They want to remove any cheap energy that makes green energy not viable. It's why Biden works so hard to keep gas prices around $4, because that's the break even point when it becomes cheaper to have an electric car. If Nuclear is keeping prices down, it makes green energy unreasonable due to the cost.
Look at people who drive electric cars in winter and have to choose between using the heat and having more range. None of this green energy stuff is about the energy grid or me and you and making things better, it's about transforming power into something for the elites.
Completely agree
True.
Problem with nuclear... Is where one needs to get involved to get "nuclear"
That's the only REAL problem when it comes to nuclear energy, as far as I'm concerned. And I have nothing against russia, to be clear. Also... Australia is pretty far away.
That being said, uranium's "detection from above", by satellites, is pretty difficult, because of the natural "radioactive noise" in the ground acting as a mask... https://www.siliconrepublic.com/climate/radioactive-map-earth
Schrodinger kind of stuff...
We should already have molten-salt thorium reactors at this point. Instead we pay for niggers to buy gold CHAINGZ n SHEEEIIT.
(post is archived)