You are not wrong, in general. This however, was not hard at all to differentiate if you actually read even the first couple of sentences of the article. If you only read headlines, and post only headlines, the only thing you are doing is spreading bullshit that gets spread around by the rest of the lazy people that only read headlines. Which makes us all look like gullible retards, and further advances any argument against these "bastions" of free speech.
I guess it's fare to say, anyone paying attention to the 2027 in the headline would recognize it too, but it seems like the other replies didn't pick up on that. Hell even I didn't... part of the ship, part of the crew.
You are not wrong, in general. This however, was not hard at all to differentiate if you actually read even the first couple of sentences of the article. If you only read headlines, and post only headlines, the only thing you are doing is spreading bullshit that gets spread around by the rest of the lazy people that only read headlines. Which makes us all look like gullible retards, and further advances any argument against these "bastions" of free speech.
I guess it's fare to say, anyone paying attention to the 2027 in the headline would recognize it too, but it seems like the other replies didn't pick up on that. Hell even I didn't... part of the ship, part of the crew.
Your point is noted.
Your point is noted.
(post is archived)