Remember when a doctor could lose his license for publicly stating this?
No please pry it out of the memory to remind us all of the 24hr psyop that told us we were all going to die if we didn't inject the bioweapon.
I must've missed it.
Remember when a doctor could lose his license for publicly stating this?
No please pry it out of the memory to remind us all of the 24hr psyop that told us we were all going to die if we didn't inject the bioweapon.
I must've missed it.
At the end of the article -
'This finding does not amount to evidence against the benefit of vaccination with these vaccines, which effectively protect against severe COVID-19 outcomes. Therefore, current vaccine recommendations are unlikely to be altered due to these results.'
Yeah, get fcked bitch - go wreck yourself ...
Article link for pic in OP?
5% rule
Help me out here, please. Only search results I got were about investment or real estate.
What's the 5% rule?
I did a reverse image search on the OP pic, but got no hits with an article about myocarditis and the vax.
Edit: I think you mean only 5% read the article and I really hadn't looked at it because from your post I figured the archive link goes to the misinformation claim, not the debunking of it. After glancing at the article, I think it seriously downplays the role of free spike in heart muscle inflammation.
The development of myocarditis following mRNA vaccination is rare, occurring in <2 per 100,000 individuals.
Yeah, how would they know what the actual rate is - all the VAERS reporting systems around the world are voluntary and therefore already under-reporting.
Iirc, vaxx manufacturers use the working term 'Rare' to describe something that 'does not occur 100% of the time' - complete joo inversion.
(post is archived)