Like how the greenhouse emissions from manufacturing green-energy equipment is orders of magnitude higher than the reduction provided by that equipment?
Like how the greenhouse emissions from manufacturing green-energy equipment is orders of magnitude higher than the reduction provided by that equipment?
And the jews have known this from the start. The whole idea isn't to replace meat with something that works, the idea is to use it to destroy the meat industries and then yank away the new stuff which will be "suddenly" discovered to be bad for you. The result will be chaos and starvation that will kill millions(or potentially billions if the other dominoes fall). The whole point isn't meat replacement, it's depopulation.
And the jews have known this from the start. The whole idea isn't to replace meat with something that works, the idea is to use it to destroy the meat industries and then yank away the new stuff which will be "suddenly" discovered to be bad for you. The result will be chaos and starvation that will kill millions(or potentially billions if the other dominoes fall). The whole point isn't meat replacement, it's depopulation.
A study from the Uni of California, Davis found that lab-grown, or “cultivated” meat’s environmental impact, based on energy use and greenhouse gas emissions, is
likely to be“orders of magnitude” higher than traditionally raised beef.
> A study from the Uni of California, Davis found that lab-grown, or “cultivated” meat’s environmental impact, based on energy use and greenhouse gas emissions, is ~~likely to be~~ “orders of magnitude” higher than traditionally raised beef.
(post is archived)