![Voat.xyz is 6 months old now, let's look at the progress report. [1366x9275 - 5.22MB]](https://files.catbox.moe/m795jy.jpg){kind=link}
It's a good call that he's against child nudity and SBBH, even though he didn't start out that way. Letting SBBH do whatever they wanted ruined Voat and banning child nudity draws a firm line against pedophilia. Of course, banning loli as well would be better.
There was no pedophilia on voat. It was one picture, which was that creepy drawing in the middle of his psycho's screenshots. It does not violate US law even if it's in bad taste.
It was one picture
OP's post shows two images.
It does not violate US law even if it's in bad taste.
It's still good that it was banned because it prevents people from playing games to see how close they can skirt the line.
The unfortunate thing is, he claims to have banned it but allowed it to exist when it was his buddy. It's a lot to go through, but the bias is illustrated. In addition, speaking against it sparked a lot of hostile reactions from a small group of people, including @NicotinicAcid here. It's interesting to say the least.
Nah it was over the one picture I mentioned. He was doing this for a week straight. The second picture is likely from the resulting arguments.
This was handled by the "female" admin at voat.
This is basically an advertisement for his own pedophilia.
This guy is Antiliberalsociety on xyz and he's our resident autist, this is the funniest shit so far.
He's been kvetching non-stop about that post of the TV-hipped girl and made everyone in chat out to be a pedo apologizer, almost got banned for concern trolling, made another user lose his shit and delete his account and now we found this mile long autism.jpg in one of his comments.
hey faggot could you reduce my score by 10 again? the last one wasn't obvious enough
(post is archived)