WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Your entire response was what is said first. BS. You sound like a. liberal lawyer. NO ONE that thinks Freedom of speech Means freedom to LIE.

[–] 0 pt

I get it. That pisses you off. Im not happy about it either but "false speech" (lies) are still free speech. The context matters when it comes to the law but that is it. Unless you think that you are the single source of what is true or false?

[–] 0 pt

Wrong. They Lie to twist the facts and they cause damage and cost Millions and cover up crimes with their lies. The basic of yelling fire in a public place should be multiplied by about a million in the trial of MSM.

[–] 1 pt

I know, i know. I get it. But you are arguing from a point of what is morally right and they don't fucking care. They use language as a weapon.

Ill give you this one from 2016. https://archive.today/29hC2

Not going to tell you what to think or feel but the important language is there and unfortunately this is the game that is in play.

Here is a relevant clip. No matter what you feel. This is currently how things work and the limitations we work in. It is our job to make it better. I am not fighting you. Even decades ago there was no truth in media, it may have looked like it but there never was. It was an illusion.

>Under U.S. law, many falsehoods—even some deliberate lies—receive the full protection of the First Amendment. That is true even though “there is no constitutional value in false statements of fact,” as Justice Lewis Powell Jr. wrote for the Supreme Court in 1974. Nonetheless, the Court has often refused to allow government to penalize speakers for mistakes, sloppy falsehoods, and lies. Political lies are strongly protected; but even private lies sometimes are as well.