not what I meant, quote the english translation of it, maybe that is wrong and we can then discuss that but make that small bit of an effort at least
Fair... but you are also missing a little of what I am saying. I would not be surprised if you could find that exact word-for-word quote in some English language translation of one of his books... but i would have to read C&P again to find the exact chapter and verse, which would be a real slog to win a stupid internet argument.
My point that when you see "Fact Checkers' calling this 'False' they are duplicitous and are employing the same logic as when they called the '13%' idiom as false.... "Nu-uh! they are 13.4% of the population! this statement is false!" They quibble on a technicality and trust that most people have not and will not read C&P.
why change the quote when there is no need, just to make it shorter? make the meme more able to go viral? it does fundamentally change the meaning so shouldn't be done. No need, makes the liberal fact checks job easy to disprove fake news, why make it easy on them? Why defend this? Weird.
When I quote MLK I don't mention my daughter like MLK did. I quote him exactly like I typed it above.
No one jumps up and yells "Fact Check False!" And if they did, I would challenge their stupidity the same way I am challenging the stupidity of Ftn807 above.
(post is archived)