Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] • 4 pts

I like fit women, but not jacked. I don’t mind a visible six pack, but not like 5% body fat.

[–] • 2 pts

A woman with 5% body fat would most likely be dead or in the hospital in critical condition. Women and men are different. Add 10% to the male number to get female of similar look. Tits, ass and thighs of women hold a significant amount of fat.

[–] • 3 pts

I will fuck anyone that isn't fat but i don't want to hear their thoughts. Stfu.

[–] • 2 pts

The boys who want ripped girls are looking for a heroine to protect them

It's complete gender role reversal and it's fuking pathetic. No matter what these broken humans fantasize women have the ovaries and are therefor far more valuable.

This is what gives us our functional gender roles. Form following function.

[–] • 0 pt

Thin or toned. An actual six pack on a woman is not attractive. To me at least.

[–] • 0 pt

Abs are definitely attractive to me, but not the kind when they get all veiny and chiseled. They especially shouldn't have an upper body with much definition. Now, lower body building is perfectly fine with me. Who doesn't love a nice bulky and firm ass with wide hips?

[–] • 0 pt

Hes right, some of them get fucking gross, & literally look like men. Usually the ones with ugly faces. They're overcompensating.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

It's not even really a marker of fitness for men, staying in single digit bodyfat will often decrease testosterone, reduce strength and make one more susceptible to injury.

Many of the best fighters ever looked like they've never worked out, Fedor always had love handles.

Females basically just do squats and deadlifts or leg press, that's pretty much it. Easy.

[–] • 0 pt

Yes however;

single digits

Eh. Not really. Sub 8% is when it gets bad. 8-10 is fine with regards to all of the downfalls when you go lower.

[–] • 0 pt

As if being completely shredded is easy and the only result of being in shape.

[–] • 3 pts

Athletic builds on women are beautiful. Bulking muscles on women are disgusting. I agree, homos love that shit. Abs are a bit more tame though. But have seen some disgusting women with ripped abs. Likewise, seen beautiful women with more tame versions.

The history guy is likely a closeted fag. His attack is personal and felt called out because he's a fag.

[–] • 2 pts

I like to see a "shadow" of abs on a girl in the act, you know what I mean? Like when she breathes or twists her body the right way, you can see them a little bit.

This is typically accompanied by a good all-around body, though; perhaps it's like an immediate visual signal that "this woman takes care of her body, so I want to take care of her body" sort of thing?

[–] • 0 pt

Women with shoulders (not traps, but shoulders) are hot IMO, abs are amazing too. As long as she isn't buff, but still petite but just low BF% that's still healthy: I'm game.

[–] • 0 pt

This is retarded as fuck. The top half is so wrong on point.

women who have 14-20% body fat are bad!!!!

It's wrong, medically retarded, culturally retarded, and historically wrong+retarded.

[–] • 0 pt

Low body fat doesn't always mean toned.

[–] • 0 pt

toned

Made up (((fitness industry))) word that means nothing. Yes low body fat necessarily means you'll be more "toned", meaning: more definition, more striations, more vascular. It's a physiological fact and you're arguing against it.