WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts

“Brain dead” is a term doctors use to describe current lack of brain function in certain areas (not all) in order to harvest organs for “organ donation.” It’s shit and should be illegal too.

[–] 3 pts

So many stories of "braindead" people waking up right before surgery and surviving.. how many DIDN'T make it?

How many people in comas could be stimulated to awake or communicated with using something like the neuralink and similar tech being developed for GAMING?

[–] 3 pts

So since women seem braindead as well can we just chain them up and have them produce some damn children so we don't die out?

What's the downside? A slight reduction in the effective workforce, having to hire male teachers and thus increasing wages of all men?

.. but we could easily save what that would cost on all the consumerism, welfare and luxury goods no longer required to woo/be spent on women.

Rage against the suggestion if you will - I'm not super comfortable with it myself - but it would absolutely work.

[–] 3 pts

just chain them up and have them produce some damn children

Axlotl tanks.

A slight reduction in the effective workforce

An increase actually. Women are such a drain, as a whole, on the workforce that removing them would increase productivity a measurable amount.

[–] 0 pt

Axlotl tanks.

Long term (50 years perhaps) that could be the future of mankind.

[–] 2 pts

Human life is determined by two things.

One. Life is defined by self replicating cells. Unborn babies are indeed life.

Two. Human. Cells containing the human genome. Unborn babies are human beings.

As we grow we gain functions. Later we lose functions. But along the journey we remain human.

Evil people dehumanize the unborn do that they can strip protection from their victims

[–] 2 pts (edited )

Brain dead people are a poor analogy since they have no chance of recovering and living their lives. An unconscious person is a better comparison, like soneone under general anesthesia, they'd be a better comparison. But the real thing I have issue with is the implied assumption that oppression of women needs to be excused, as if it were a bad thing, it's not a bad thing, it's a good thing. I'm fact, the oppression of women is a side benefit to banning abortion, which makes the policy yet more attractive that it already was. Women should be oppressed, nothing but bad has ever come from women's liberation, in fact, the more oppressed women were, the better things were for the men and the better things were for the men, the better things were for civilization, which improved things for everyone, even the women. Ergo, the more oppressed women are, the better the civilization will be, and so maximum oppression of women would lead to the maximum good for the people as a whole. Hence why I support females being enslaved by makes, the maximum level of oppression is being reduced to the level of an object, some piece of property to be owned and to be done with as their owner pleases.

Keep your legs and your mouth shut, slag.