![You are forbidden from connecting those dots [666x196 - 13KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/7iGiDw.png){kind=link}
To be fair, that's a stupid point. It only sounds sensical if you don't actually think too hard about it. If you are going to argue against the vaccine it is best to do so with valid arguments.
To be fair, that's a stupid point. It only sounds sensical if you don't actually think too hard about it. If you are going to argue against the vaccine it is best to do so with valid arguments.
Oh I'm sorry smartass. Please do enlighten me as to how hard your consumers have to think to buy into a vaccine that has 96% success rate for a disease for which their age groups has a 99% survival rate.
Oh I'm sorry smartass. Please do enlighten me as to how hard your consumers have to think to buy into a vaccine that has 96% success rate for a disease for which their age groups has a 99% survival rate.
Well what exactly do you think that even means? That taking the vaccine lowers your probability of a negative outcome?
Any results for the vaccine are going to additive.
Well what exactly do you think that even means? That taking the vaccine lowers your probability of a negative outcome?
Any results for the vaccine are going to additive.
(post is archived)