Did you know? The ban appeal form (Reddit.com/appeal) only allows for 250 characters.

Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

•

When , I was forced to the ban using just 250 characters, shorter than the maximum tweet length (280).

One is forced to formally explain something to some administrators using just 250 characters.

I know, they might have many ban appeals to review, but 250 characters are ridiculously low.

When [I was unreasonably banned from Reddit](/p/115459), I was forced to [appeal](https://reddit.com/appeal) the ban **using just 250 characters,** shorter than the maximum tweet length (280). One is forced to formally explain something to some [biased](/p/117841) administrators using just 250 characters. I know, they might have many ban appeals to review, but **250 characters are ridiculously low.**

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (7).

[–] • 1 pt

Why 250?

‘Didnt do nuffing’ is only like 5.

link

[–] • 1 pt

Would that have gotten me unsuspended?

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

Dependent on skin tone... yes.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

How are they supposed to know the skin tone of the user?
And which skin tone is likelier to get unsuspended?

parent
link

Load more (1 reply)

/s/MeanwhileOnReddit

View this sub's wiki

created ago

About this sub

This is a subverse for pointing out faguettery and censorship on Reddit, but also for popular and relevant content.

Posting tips:

After posting a link, don't forget to back up your shared link into at least one web archival service, such as and .
- Optionally, apply the ?limit=500 URL parameter to archive more comments of a large conversation.
Feedback about this subverse is welcome. Add the “Meta” flair to your post.
To historical posts, preferably add a date at the end of the title and the flair “Historical”.
Note to readers:

Custom emojis:

`
`
`
`
`
`
, `

Putting words into user's mouths, which means making them appear like they wrote something they never actually did, especially on sensitive posts, is one of the greatest violations of user trust possible.

Although shortly after he applogized and promised never to do it again, it clearly gives away how Reddit tends to handle criticism.

Resources

Wiki article: - Anyone can contribute to the article.

Also see:

• More general posts.
• Share stories about misbehaving leadership of any online community.
• Welcoming new Poalr Bears.

CSS information

If the appearance of this site changes based on the browser used, or if you have any other issues with the appearance of this subverse, please let us know.