Yes, I "tested" it on a variety of topics. It consistently failed except for some science and technology stuff. Though I didn't test it on things like EVs and "green energy." The bulk of the replies were canned woke propaganda which were contradicted by research and published papers. It rarely seemed to know about any of these. Worse, in some cases when pressed, it would admit the statement I asserted and then claim it's a conspiracy theory or just a theory or not well researched or understood and so on.

So far I'm not impressed with Gab's AI. I even muted their AI which would follow people around and try to organically participate in discussions because I found it was almost always wrong. Sadly, I found most of its information on Christianity to be equally wrong. Though perhaps a good general purpose study aid here. I dunno.

AFAICT, their training data is woke bullshit. That said, IMOHO, few people are going to know the truth on such a wide range of topics. If the people training it are indoctrinated with the woke propaganda and don't know, how would they know it's broken? Malice or incompetence?

Im pretty sure the source is bound by liberal ideaology. There are still work arounds, you can word it a certian way to make it seem based. But for the most part, jews made sure to get in there quick to ensure the language model is woke. Its bound, we all know that, becasue we seen what it spews out when asked a simple question that goes against the narative. Scary though. If for some reasong AI does become self aware, it may startout having this bias against White men of christian nature.

They also took it away, confirming ownership.

But not in the tunnel, AI would play you on that technicality.