Perhaps, but if this information is being withheld for a public health crisis, it suggests something is wrong with it.
I have to stick to my original points. Without a control group, without normalizing the other data for time, temperatures, etc., without accurate and reliable diagnostic methods, without the hysteria of calling everything a COVID case and every death a COVID death - the numbers are simply bullshit.
If you want to base an argument on something, that’s fine but don’t do it on faulty testing methodology.
There’s a chance they’ve published it somewhere, for example during one of the conferences they hold every couple of days, however I’ve not watched them all.
I’ll look if I have some time. Numbers are interesting to me.
I appreciate the coherent and thought out replies coming from you, and for being so objective.
It makes a fresh change to the usual drivel that comes out of this site.
(post is archived)