Why are you so concerned?
Because you decided to use a title that is explicitly blaming a "white guy" from a different source and applied it to a post that specifically shared other sources instead.
That Romanian guy looks/would be classified as white in America. CFP was not wrong to describe him as a "white" guy. CFP did not say he was a "White guy" (implying White Christian of European descent). Many on POAL make a huge distinction of "White" vs "white", why does that not also apply here?
The msn article describes the breaking news but excludes pictures of the perp. I include a video of the perp with the relevant article describing the attack and you have an issue with it?
I read a comment on one of your posts this morning that the perp was a follower of Nick Fuentes? That's a twist, doesn't make sense to me. I have not seen an article with proof of this yet. I'm sure there is much more truth to dig up, as with all breaking news in the first 24hrs.
I'm not questioning you sharing content, just that you used a title from a source that is blaming it on a "white guy" and attached it to different sources in a post.
The guy isn't White, he's a light-skinned borderline Eastern-Europe and Middle-East mongrel. Just like Turks and jews.
I researched Romanians earlier this morning. TIL where gypsies come from. I can better understand your disdain for Romanians now.
Still, here in America, everyone would simply consider him "white" in appearance regardless of his religion or origin. This is why I was not urked by the CFP title on the x post. I was expecting a shitskin perp ... a "white" guy perp in cases like this is quite uncommon. My first thought was he was a (((DS))) MKUltra type set out to destroy the argument that all European mindless stabbings were done by shitskin invaders. Of course I did not mention that psy-op theory without having any proof, only my suspicion. The Nick Fuentes connection (if true) would align with my initial theory.
(post is archived)