WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.4K

(post is archived)

It's ok to work 160 hours a month to cover the median rent with federal minimum wage because flat screen tvs exist.

Boomer detected, opinion discarded.

[–] 1 pt

So you think the lowest legally possible paying job should provide a life of luxury and support a family. Thats absurd. And fuck off with yur boomer bullshit. Im a milennial, the way i understand it. On the older edge of it.

[–] 2 pts

Most don't have families to support, the kind of money it takes to attract a woman is unobtainable for most men.

[–] 1 pt

The minimum wage should be providing enough for a person to feed themself; over the years, the min wage has always been able to buy a couple loaves of bread for one hour of work.

Currently, people that live in poverty in the USA are living better than any king could have dreamed.

[–] 0 pt

So you think the lowest legally possible paying job should provide a life of luxury and support a family.

People can't even support themselves in a life above poverty on minimum wage without foodstamps, let alone start a family.

Don't worry though, the government is cutting all the social programs but only for white people, all the non-whites still get all the handouts they could ever use.

Thats absurd. And fuck off with yur boomer bullshit. Im a milennial, the way i understand it. On the older edge of it.

Your age doesn't matter, you're a spiritual boomer.

[–] 1 pt

Gotcha, spiritual boomer, because i dont think the most useless people are entitled to a house, car, computer etc etc etc for simply performing menial work that any retarded nigger is capable of.