Yet another company with a "forced arbitration" clause. Or as Louis Rossmann likes to say a "Rapist mentality".
Archive: https://archive.today/5nekQ
From the post:
>A New Jersey couple suffered 'life-changing' injuries after crashing in an Uber -- and have now learned they can't sue the company. Georgia and John McGinty of Princeton, New Jersey, were told by a judge they're bound by a sneaky clause in Uber's terms and conditions which states they cannot take a case to a jury in a court of law. On March 31, 2022, the couple were passengers in a vehicle operated by Uber driver Jia Wen Zheng when Zheng ran a red light and t-boned a vehicle, according to court documents.
excellent point. most 1099 employees have Errors and Omission insurance. Not sure if he's required to have or not, I'd imagine yes but what should be isn't the case typically nowadays.
