WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

151

Projecting the rights reserved for citizenship onto illegal invaders.

Archive (archive.today)

Projecting the rights reserved for citizenship onto illegal invaders. [Archive](https://archive.today/Ig5I3)

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts

Why do we care what his "gun rights" are?

He is a criminal illegal alien. He is not even allowed to be in this country.

He should be deported and we should not even be having this conversation.

[–] 3 pts

Carbajal-Flores has consistently adhered to and fulfilled all the stipulated conditions of his release, is gainfully employed, and has no new arrests or outstanding warrants.”

Hold on a moment. "Gainfully employed" Is he even legally employed?!

[–] 2 pts

As an illegal invader he isn't legally employable.

[–] 1 pt

It's neither constitutional nor unconstitutional. The notion itself is irrelevant because they're not citizens.

A non-citizen has zero rights, and zero entitlements, to consider with regard to the Constitution.

The judge decided this on the wrong premises...

obama appointee

... which he did intentionally. He's willfully conflating rights with entitlements, to give to the jew who argued this whag he wants.

Like every other kike-loving law nigger.

[–] 1 pt

What good is an invader without a weapon?