She was play acting as a man. Her "depression" was caused IMO because she didn't have the real balls to "be" a man. I would probably read the book, but it's still through the eyes of a female, thus can never really express what men think. Most just keep getting up and doing whatever difficult task at hand without complaint.

Dear lord our people are fucking retards.

She DID NOT kill her self BECAUSE of the experiment. First, she conducted the experiment almost 20 years ago. Second, the experiment went on for basically two years. Two years to do something like that is bloody impressive by any standard. Not a single one of our people picked a project and stuck with it for two years, that is for sure.

She did go into therapy after the experiment according to the documentary done on the book and her experience. However, she probably suffered from depression and other mental illnesses anyway. Her doctor assissted death could have been related to either ongoing mental issues or it could have been something along the lines of having cancer or other fatal and incurable medical issues.

Cindy Crawford also did the same experiement in the 90s for about two days. She had access to the best makeup/prostetics artists in the world and had her self made up like a man and did the whole walk around and be a man for two days. When she was interviewed about the experiment on a talk show she said that she was surprised how invisible men were. No one paid attention to them, no one cared as if they were totally invisible. Of course, Crawford is dead wrong because she doesn't have access to the invisible network of signals that we process all the time as we are always a walking threat of violence to others and other men against us and we are very directly hooked into what is going on around us all the time. Regardless, Crawfords point is still valid from a female perspective in the sense that civilization is not designed for us, it is designed by us for women.

The work that the lesbian did and the frankness and honesty with which she chose to tell mens story was eye opening for everyone, including most men. Most men live in the now and never consider what it means to be a man, and when they do (like in this pathetic thread) it's a shallow skin deep analysis worth nothing.

Sometimes you need someone from the outside to tell you about you so that you can start to really appreciate your own unique gifts and challenges in the world, and this woman helped in that regard.

Here is another lesbian talking about men and women in some rather broad but correct narrative strokes (7 min): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14XnHufKDok

In that video Camille Paglia speaks about how men and women have ALWAYS basically existed in SEPARATE CULTURES. The modern conception of men and women living in close quarters for extended periods of time (at least for our white species of human) is a fairly new concept. For the last 10 000 years men mostly were out farming and beyond the 10 000 years out hunting and so forth while women mostly stayed in the village and tended to the day to day stuff. If you pay attention to the point that she is making, men and women co-evolved into what we are in very much that pattern. Men and women have COMPLETELY different cultures that are burried deep into our genomes, so much so that not only can this never be engineered out like the jewish cultists utopians have been trying to for the last 2000 years, true happiness lies in both of us recognizing the deep nature of those differences and leaning into them.

A lot of posts here are spending time commenting on the lesbians degeneracy. Sure fine, whatever, it's a trivial mark.

You guys should spend a bit more time thinking about what it means for the occasional bit of insight we can glean even from the degenerates. Study your enemy. Learn from them. Occasionally you will learn about your self.

A bit of a shame. The world needs honest people, even if they are faggots.

https://archive.ph/hyff2 NYT obituary

Doesn't back up what the screen cap said. But doesn't mean it isn't true. Could just be an omission.

I would be interested to read more about this if anyone has a link the collaborates it.

im laughing harder at this than the joke from the post before i hit reply.

Since there are only two possible genders/sexes (same thing), it probably made her upset she wasn't as strong, durable or had as much endurance as the other men. I can imagine the frustration of being a biological woman and pretending to be a man and realizing men carry 90% of the physical workforce and being physically unable to keep up or be an equal.

I imagine it's similar to the frustration biological women feel when biological men pretend to be women and dominate them.

Odd that being a woman didn’t give her an advantage

I once pretended to be a woman on the lesbian side of omegele chat only. I did nothing different in my approach other say I was a girl. The women were HIGHLY responsive, as men would expect they should be from the start. Always gearing the chat conversation to a call. Got it, was a girl on the other side.

Pretty much the end of the road of the feminism journey for all these empowered millennial career women.

feminism is necessary to stop genital mutilation (clit removals and circumcisions), hijab enforcements, and general abuse, not really necessary in modern America at all (except to combat blatant sexism, however rare). It's simple: equal in value on an esoteric level, but not the same at all physically etc.