Read the paper
Why? It starts by playing on jews' terms. It may say some good things but it says a lot of bad things simply by applying 'gender' to humans.
Read the paper, it says it's normal to have both be the same and saying they can be different isn't normal. If you aren't going to read this then point out some other source. You like criticizing everything but don't offer up any solutions or papers of your own that people can reference.
I shouldn't need to source you that 'gender' isn't applicable to anything outside of linguistics. It's a term that applies to words that have "characteristics of one or the other sex", but words don't have sex, they aren't biological. So words have gender. Humans do not have gender, can not have gender, have never had gender and will never have gender.
it says it's normal to have both be the same...
Nope. Because that's not normal as gender doesn't apply to biology or sexuality. Stop arguing for judaism. That's what this paper is, it's to shift the overton window left and to condition language in doing so.
You like criticizing everything but don't offer up any solutions or papers of your own that people can reference.
Correct. Because I shouldn't need to source anything for you or anybody to understand that 'gender' doesn't fucking exist in humans. It's not a thing.
(post is archived)