Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

https://www.opindia.com/2023/04/genitals-dont-determine-gender-cji-chandrachud-in-same-sex-marriage-hearing/ -> https://archive.md/nJKuo

"It's not the question of what your genitals are. It's far more complex, that's the point. So even when Special Marriage Act says man and woman, the very notion of a man and a woman is not an absolute based on genitals," he further added.

https://www.opindia.com/2023/04/genitals-dont-determine-gender-cji-chandrachud-in-same-sex-marriage-hearing/ -> https://archive.md/nJKuo >"It's not the question of what your genitals are. It's far more complex, that's the point. So even when Special Marriage Act says man and woman, the very notion of a man and a woman is not an absolute based on genitals," he further added.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (4).
[–] • 0 pt

I don't think feeling, believing, talking like you do in your post is very constructive. I think it's quite the opposite, it's extremely defeatist. I get what you're saying, it feels a bit like "JUST ACCELERATE", but I don't actually think so. I think sticking to norms, to reality, to the natural is the best in this circumstance. Dunno if that makes sense but in some places I can see it, like that teacher with the over-the-top giant tits, Canada IIRC. That's accelerate.