Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

264

In this article and the discussion that follows I aim to model the sort of adult conversation about a difficult topic that is rarely seen anymore.

And vaccines make you gay...

There are now at least 23 empirical studies that show that people with sexual dysphoria are significantly more likely to be autistic (and vice versa). See literature review here — footnotes 12 through 34.

If autism is the result of injury from toxicants including vaccines (it is), and autistic people are more likely to be trans (they are), then it is also likely that sexual dysphoria is vaccine injury.

Here is some thoughtful perspective from an SJW about the trans thing. I have been following this substack which is mostly vax articles. I did not know about this side of author.

>In this article and the discussion that follows I aim to model the sort of adult conversation about a difficult topic that is rarely seen anymore. And vaccines make you gay... >There are now at least 23 empirical studies that show that people with sexual dysphoria are significantly more likely to be autistic (and vice versa). See literature review here — footnotes 12 through 34. >If autism is the result of injury from toxicants including vaccines (it is), and autistic people are more likely to be trans (they are), then it is also likely that sexual dysphoria is vaccine injury. Here is some thoughtful perspective from an SJW about the trans thing. I have been following this substack which is mostly vax articles. I did not know about this side of author.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (15).
[–] • 1 pt

Correlation is not causation as they say. The autism could be attributed to any environmental factor, I could show a study that microplastics are increasing in the food supply, or hormones from the food chain on the rise, which would also correlate with the rise in autism. If you can't demonstrate a causal link then you're just dabbling in conspiracies.

This is technically true, there is no way to prove what effect microplastics, hormones in the food and water, overvaccination, heavy metals from plane exhaust, etc have on human behavior and development, but that is only because those things are ubiquitous by design. Corporations have been given license to freely experiment on the population and they choose to do so with no control group, making it impossible to study these things scientifically.

Well meaning people trying to be "scientifically minded" will generally treat the possible dangers as unproven and thus better to ignore. The problem with that thinking is that it assumes "no effect" as a default.

That is unfalsifiable and actually unscientific. The human brain is not magically insulated from environmental changes. There is no known mechanism for the brain to develop identically in different chemical environments.

Claiming that any or all of those things don't cause autism, sex disorders etc, is just that, a claim and it's a claim with no more evidence than the reverse.

The default position for any reasonable person is that we don't know and currently cannot know. What we do know however is that this situation is intentional, by corporations who have a financial incentive to hide any harmful effects of their products. The FDA has been bought and paid for by these corporations, so rather than prove their products are safe THEN release them, we have a situation where they can release their products into an environment where proper testing is impossible and then act like the burden of proof is on everyone else, to provide evidence they have made impossible to obtain.

TL;DR corporate personhood was a mistake, reddit soy boys don't know how science works and their propaganda distorted thinking works it's way even into "based" forums.

[–] • 0 pt

Check out this other post from today on the 'based forum' that is also about the possible causes of increasing rates of autism diagnosis - https://poal.co/s/USNews/557350 - the linked article cites a study which gives no suggestions as to the causes, although it does then quote some dude from the Epoch Times who gives his own guesses, which are different from the Substack fags guesses. They are all just guessing.

The burden of proof is not on me to forensically explain why each random guess is not true - the burden of proof rests with the people making the suggestions. Random guesses are polluting the discourse, not helping to get to the truth - they are building a hall of mirrors.

I want to believe that there is a smoking gun out there that can be evidentially proven, be it vaccines / autoimmune response, glyphosate, or some other vector for the autism phenomenon. I may also want to believe there is a depopulation agenda behind it. But it is too easy to let my personal prejudice influence my suspicions, it's human nature. Robert de Niro thinks his son is autistic because of vaccines. Someone who lives next to a chemical plant, or under a pylon might blame those instead.

But thank you for your well reasoned response, clearly more research is required, perhaps it is a confluence of factors causing the phenomena and will be more complicated and take more time to understand than either of us would like, but as public pressure grows and more research is undertaken in response, a responsible party or factor can be identified.