Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

847

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caroline_Yadan

During Yadan's campaign, she emphasized her strong support for the State of Israel along with a desire to address antisemitism. Yadan previously characterized boycott of Israeli businesses at the Eurosatory exhibition as illegal. Israel Hayom described Yadan as a "Zionist Jew".

His examples, Mandela and evil Nazis, suck. The fact that criticism of israel is outlawed, stands.

In effect this law would turn France's foreign policy into unchallengeable dogma backed by prison time. You could literally be sent for 5 years in prison if you, for instance, call what France says are "terrorists" a "resistance group."

Think for instance Nelson Mandela during the apartheid (the ANC was on every Western terrorist list) or, heck, France's own Résistance against Nazi Germany - designated as "terrorists" by the Vichy regime and the Nazi occupation.

It's frankly absolutely insane.

The new law is called "loi Yadan" after its author Caroline Yadan, a MP who represents French expatriates living in Israel. The U.S. has congressmen paid by AIPAC: France has cut out the middleman entirely, we have MPs whose constituency is literally in Israel.

The law has already passed committee and heads to a full parliamentary vote on April 16th - 3 days from now - under a very unusual fast-track procedure. Seven of eleven parliamentary groups have said they'll vote yes and the law is expected to pass.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caroline_Yadan >During Yadan's campaign, she emphasized her strong support for the State of Israel along with a desire to address antisemitism. Yadan previously characterized boycott of Israeli businesses at the Eurosatory exhibition as illegal. Israel Hayom described Yadan as a "Zionist Jew". His examples, Mandela and evil Nazis, suck. The fact that criticism of israel is outlawed, stands. > In effect this law would turn France's foreign policy into unchallengeable dogma backed by prison time. You could literally be sent for 5 years in prison if you, for instance, call what France says are "terrorists" a "resistance group." > Think for instance Nelson Mandela during the apartheid (the ANC was on every Western terrorist list) or, heck, France's own Résistance against Nazi Germany - designated as "terrorists" by the Vichy regime and the Nazi occupation. > It's frankly absolutely insane. > The new law is called "loi Yadan" after its author Caroline Yadan, a MP who represents French expatriates living in Israel. The U.S. has congressmen paid by AIPAC: France has cut out the middleman entirely, we have MPs whose constituency is literally in Israel. > The law has already passed committee and heads to a full parliamentary vote on April 16th - 3 days from now - under a very unusual fast-track procedure. Seven of eleven parliamentary groups have said they'll vote yes and the law is expected to pass.
You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (5).
[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Related:

The Slow Clap

Most people are familiar with situations where a response of applause is both appropriate and expected. Normally, due to regularity of the situation occurring, the exact timing of when everyone should begin the applaud response is known and all people proceed to respond at the same time.

Additionally, sometimes a situation comes about where everyone recognizes that a response of applause is both appropriate and necessary, but the timing of when everyone should begin the response is not as clearly defined. This usually results in individuals who are most familiar with the situation or most informed on when a response should be made to be the ones starting it off and everyone else will follow their lead nearly instantly.

However, there are some situations that are very new to all people where they recognize that a response is warranted, but they are unsure of whether responding is appropriate, if it is expected, or if it is frowned upon. This situation will often result in one person recognizing that a response is absolutely appropriate and they will start off The Slow Clap.

The Slow Clap often progresses in primarily one of two ways for most situations, though there are plenty of others that occur:

1) The clapper gives a response of one loud clap that, after a delay, is followed by another and they slowly increase in speed and loudness. This often coincides with looking around at others either in encouragement for them to recognize that it is an appropriate or warranted response for the situation and to join in, or to gauge how accurate their assessment was by how their action is received.

While looking around, the clapper can expect to be met with:

  • A Negative Reaction: Stares and head shakes of condemnation, resulting in the Clapper slowing the clap before stopping entirely.
  • A Mixed Reaction: A few others hesitantly join in with the response possibly due to having thought it was appropriate as well, but they were not sure enough in themselves to start it off, or because they do what they think is expected of them and would rather be early with taking part rather than to be one of the last. Either way, these people will also look around to see if the rest are joining in or not or if they made a mistake by joining in. Even if the response really was appropriate, if the majority do not also join in, the clappers quickly slow and then stop their clapping and the response dies simply because the majority didn't take part in the response.
  • A Positive Reaction: Everyone quickly recognizes that this clapper is right and they should also be responding. The slow clap is then quickly drowned out and replaced by everyone responding with the normal response of applause that the situation warranted or demanded.

2) The clapper gives a response of normal applause as if it was a given that applauding was the appropriate and expected response and had believed that everyone would be giving the same response alongside them. However, the clapper quickly realizes that they must have read the situation wrong as they are the only one giving this response. They then quickly halt clapping. This person will never be the first to begin clapping in the future and they will merely be a follower and only do what others do.

However, when it is overwhelmingly obvious that the situation demands everyone to take part in an enthusiastic standing ovation, but there is no clear time of when to begin giving that response, everyone is left waiting for others to initiate it. Everyone is unsure of themselves and afraid of being left in one of the "slow clap" situations and thus resign to merely waiting for a leader to signal when to respond. Sadly, they're just not hearing all of the many people already doing slow claps all around them due to all of the disruptive noise of niggers talking over the clapping. If people would open their ears, they would realize that it's already past time to start clapping themselves.

[–] • 0 pt

I sure hope the clap will happen. One of the things that's going on is what I call a "waiting for the hero" phenomena, where everyone knows that something has to be done and everyone's waiting for someone to step up first, but no one does because everyone is waiting. And when someone actually does it, sadly, people are more prone to waking up only to punish that hero rather than to join him, even though this entire time they were waiting for this exact opportunity and only twiddled their thumbs, thus starting another goy war 3. Even on a much smaller scale, we saw that in real time when that one White dude curbed the feral groid in the subway at his own peril. 1984 movie also had kind of a similar story trajectory. It's just getting harder and harder to rally behind someone in an increasingly meaningless, bleak, 0 trust world